Global Warming Scientists Felt Compelled To Lie About Findings Because They Couldn't Find Any Proof For Their Position.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/02/climate-scientists-felt-compelled-to-oversimplify-findings/1
Climate scientists felt compelled to oversimplify findings

"The problem stems from the IPCC's thorny mission: Take sophisticated and sometimes inconclusive science, and boil it down to usable advice for lawmakers," concludes the newspaper, based on its interviews with scientists and review of hundreds of panel documents and emails.

"Inconclusive science"? You mean this is still an unproved theory? You mean the IPCC had to lie to the public to convince them of the problem until they could forge enough evidence to support their position? Is this why the IPCC had to use anecdotal stories in place of data and research because the science doesn't prove the theory? So this issue was too important to bother with the truth? So these issues are too important to wait and find out if it really is a problem?

I guess now we know that fraud, deceit, lies are now a standard part of the scientific method, as well as the standard operating procedures of the United Nations.

U.N. Climate Chief Quits. Refuses To Admit He Is Incapable Of The Hypocrisy And Lies Needed For Office.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DUPPR00&show_article=1
UN climate chief quits, leaves talks hanging

Very interesting.

This news article manage to discuss the U.N. Climate Chief talking about what has happened in the past, what is happening now, and what he hopes for the future.

But not once did the article talk about the fraudulent "science" used to create the "Global Warming" hoax. Not once did they talk about how even the "scientist" who created "Global Warming" has admitted that we the world may be in a global cooling period since the middle ages.

It is good to know, that even in defeat, the hypocrites, frauds and liars infesting the United Nations refuse to acknowledge their participation in the "Global Warming" fraud.

The U.N. And 3 World Powers Criticize Iran's Nuclear Bomb Program, But Promise To Do Nothing To Stop It.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100216/ap_on_re_eu/iran_nuclear
3 world powers criticize Iranian enrichment

Because enrichment can produce both nuclear weapons as well as reactor fuel, Iran is under three set of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to stop its program. Its determination to expand such activities had been criticized worldwide even before an announcement earlier this month that Tehran would enrich to a higher level.

The United Nations is a sham organization, with no power to do anything to any country that disagrees with them. Witness the sanctions levied against North Korea. Witness North Korea ignoring the sanctions. Witness the three sets of sanctions already leveled against Iran. Witness Iran proceeding with their announcements and their continued work towards developing their nuclear bomb program.

I imagine that the United Nations will be issuing sanctions against Iran and North Korea as they send rockets carrying nuclear bombs at their real (or imagined) enemies.

Don't you feel more secure knowing that the United Nations will be very sorry (but do nothing) if some rogue nations fires rockets carrying nuclear bombs towards the United States?

The United Nations Reiterates Their Position That The Truth Has No Place In A Scientific Investigation.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece
World may not be warming, say scientists

Climate Research on weather stations casts doubt on the UN claim that temperatures are rising

As time passes, more reputable scientists are reporting on the flawed data used by the United Nations weather research stations. Since the original report by the United Nations and their pet "scientists" on "Global Warming" was largely based on anecdotal evidence from non-scientific sources, and on fraudulently modified data, the newest debunkers have not changed the U.N.'s position or goals. However, the United Nations "scientists" are scrambling to find another set of data that hasn't been debunked yet to replace the data that has already been debunked.

Just as the United Nations cling to their false belief in "Global Warming" scam to justify their attacks on more successful nations, tyrants and despots around the world also cling to belief in the "Global Warming" scam to justify their oppression of their people.

To paraphrase Voltaire “If there were no Global Warming, it would have been necessary to invent it.”

U.N. States That Lies Should Be Acceptable Proof Of Global Warming.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/23/AR2010012302399.html
U.N. climate panel chief: Error shouldn't derail global warming efforts in India

The people of India were upset to find out that the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lied to them about the seriousness of the global warming problem.

The U.N. response to being caught in a lie, was to say that even if the U.N. lied, the U.N. is telling the truth and you must listen to us.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/21/AR2009112102010.html?nav=emailpage
India challenges Western data linking climate change, Himalayan melt

India has produced a study that not only are the glaciers not receding, they are growing.

The U.N. immediately claimed that all Indian's are stupid and are incapable of scientific research.

Considering that the U.N. "scientists" deliberately falsified data, destroyed data, attacked anyone who opposed them, I don't think the U.N. can be relied on for honest, impartial review of global warming data. In fact, if this is how the U.N. typically works, I don't think we can trust anything they do.

Later that same day:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6999975.ece
UN climate panel blunders again over Himalayan glaciers

Even more people are questioning the U.N.'s big lie about global warming.

The chairman of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) used fraudulent claims to increase likelihood of additional funding. Since the chairman has his own Global Warming studies group, he is paying himself millions for further research. Proof positive that he has no conflict of interest. The chairman can also claim no bias for the green policy, because he is the founder and scientific advisor to an oil exploration and retrieval company.

What could be more honest than this? Anything else!