Search CynicalPessimist666.blogspot.com

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Since When Has It Mattered That A Politician Should Be Competent?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/03/ED501D8M6U.DTL
Whitman can spend, but can she govern?

Does it matter if Meg Whitman can't govern?

"Meg 2010, Building a New California," the glossy 40-plus page "policy agenda" for former eBay CEO and GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman, is so slick that it sat on my desk for weeks before I could finish it. I would pick it up, think that like her candidacy, it is overly packaged, and toss it back on the pile of papers that litter my desk. It does a great job of laying out California's financial woes and suggesting possible reforms - but it leaves out how she'll get things done in Sacramento.


The people of the United States elected Barack Hussein Obama as president. Barack Hussein Obama is incapable of governing. Barack Hussein Obama has no skills or qualifications or experience to run anything other than a political campaign. In fact, Barack Hussein Obama is still campaigning on the Bush did it and I didn't platform. Barack Hussein Obama's only apparent skill is to convince people that he is likeable while he is doing very unlikeable things.

Look at how Barack Hussein Obama saved the economy at the beginning of last year. After which millions of businesses closed, millions of people lost their jobs and millions of people are losing their homes. Look at how Barack Hussein Obama is forming a bipartisan consensus. All the political parties, including some democrats, are united in their opposition to Barack Hussein Obama politics. Barack Hussein Obama's mishandling of the Health Care Deform bill has caused his popularity to drop below 50%, and the rest of congress and the senate have even lower approval ratings.

So competence in office is not a prerequisite for election or serving as a politician.

California in particular and the United States in general have been voting for people who look good, but were not the best for the job. Now that we are facing the fall of the United States empire, I see no reason to change that. I don't see any politicians willing to admit that they are the cause of the problem rather than the solution. So electing someone who is incompetent won't make the State of California any worse off than it already is. After all, by any honest measure, all the politicians already in Sacramento (or Washington District of Criminals) are so incompetent and corrupt that the only thing they deserve are prison terms for destroying the economy, not reelection.

But don't hold your breath.

Obama Sends Armed Thugs To Beat Oil Slick Into Submission.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/04/obama-well-use-every-single-available-resource-to-contain-oil-slick/1
Obama: We'll use 'every single available resource' to contain oil slick
President Obama said his team would use "every single available resource" to contain the Gulf of Mexico oil slick, including dispatching teams from the Pentagon if necessary.

"Every single available resource"?

As an incompetent nincompoop, or is that competent traitor, Barack Hussein Obama is doing as much to deal with this oil spill as George W. Bush did to deal with the Hurricane Katrina. Maybe less.

Barack Hussein Obama seems to have an odd idea of what it takes to clean up an oil slick.

Barack Hussein Obama is sending in his cracked team of investigators from the Department of Homeland Security. The D.H.S. did such a good job of preventing the underwear bomber from smuggling explosives on an American airplane that they have been dispatched to the gulf of Mexico. Is Barack Hussein Obama concerned that the oil slick will be smuggling something dangerous onto American soil?

Barack Hussein Obama is also sending in S.W.A.T. teams. Is the oil slick refusing to disburse? Is the oil slick refusing to surrender peacefully?

Why is Barack Hussein Obama claiming the oil spill is an accident before actually running an investigation? Why is Barack Hussein Obama announcing that British Petroleum will pay for this whole accident? Why is Barack Hussein Obama sending in armed investigators to look at an "accident"?

Why ask why?

This is Barack Hussein Obama, after all. And talking about Barack Hussein Obama and truth is like talking about Military Intelligence, a contradiction of terms.

Monday, May 3, 2010

May I See Your Papers Please?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gIrhUxh7ZTUJ__3DbPaH5YpyPFcQD9FF9DIO0
Could immigration furor create positive evolution?

No! It can't lead to positive evolution. None of the loudmouths (Barack Hussein Obama, mass media, liberals, democrats, illegal invaders, ...) are interested in a fair, unbiased, impartial solution. All they want is to strike down ALL laws on immigration and illegal entry (invasion). It seems to me that their main concern is allowing Mexico to take back the land that the whites unfairly took from them.
What good could possibly come of this bad situation? A lot, it turns out. Because suddenly the entire nation is having a huge Arizona conversation, from rallies on the streets to voices on the airwaves — and there are signs of compromise instead of confrontation.

Compromise? Yeah. Right. We are hearing about compromise on the illegal invaders issue in the same way that Barack Hussein Obama is creating and supporting bipartisan legislation. ie. Barack Hussein Obama has not, and will not stoop to creating any kind of bipartisan legislation or support for any of his socialist pet projects.

All the illegal invaders and their supporters seem to be saying the same thing. The United States, and the individual states and cities have no right to prevent the ravening hordes from coming across the border.

California agrees, as numerous cities have declared themselves sanctuary cities for the newest criminal element to invade the United States.

This policy seems to be working well for California. The average income of a California resident is dropping like a stone. Anyone with any money or job or business is fleeing the state as fast as they can.
"I'm concerned about the whole idea of carrying papers and always having to be able to prove your citizenship," said Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. "That brings up some shades of some other regimes that weren't necessarily helpful to democracy."

Exactly. The United States is not, and has not been a democracy for a long time. So it is time to stop pretending that we are a democracy. It only leads to the lunacy of claiming that we shouldn't need to provide papers when stopped by the police.

Yet that is exactly what we are already doing. Have you ever been stopped by a policeman and NOT been asked for your drivers license and registration? Have you ever applied for a loan and not been asked for a tax return or other informational form? Do you remember when you used to need to have two forms of ID to cash a check? Do you ever use your credit card and need to show a drivers license?

We already live in a totalitarian country, where we need to show our papers to all manner of people all the time.

And to put this into perspective. Do you ever travel to other countries and need to show your passport to whatever official wants to see it?

Or to put it another way.

Do you want to make it legal for Osama Bin Laden (or any other terrorist) to walk across the Mexican - American border and not be required to show some identification papers?

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Obama Continues His Brainwash America Tour At Local University.

http://www.freep.com/article/20100502/NEWS06/5020449/1322/Michigan-grads-say-theyll-take-Obama-message-forward
Michigan grads say they'll take Obama message forward

Which message? The lies that Barack Hussein Obama spouts when he talks at students? Or the lies he spouts when he talks at politicians?
President Barack Obama challenged University of Michigan graduates to rise above the rancor that has infected politics, broaden their horizons, contribute to their country and help preserve American democracy.

What rancor is Barack Hussein Obama talking about? The stuff he spouts when he talks about anyone who opposes him?

I find it offensive when Barack Hussein Obama spouts his hypocritical nonsense at students. Barack Hussein Obama is the most socialist president the United States has ever had. So Barack Hussein Obama doesn't believe any of the nonsense he spouts about preserving American democracy when he is doing his best to destroy it.
"At a moment when our challenges seem so big and our politics seem so small, how will you keep our democracy alive and vibrant?" he asked the class of 2010. "How will you keep it well in this century?"

Barack Hussein Obama is hoping the new graduates answer is that they will keep democracy alive the same way that North Korea, China and Russia have kept democracy alive. By opposing it.
"We've got politicians calling each other all sorts of unflattering names. Pundits and talking heads shout at each other," Obama told the crowd, which included 8,500 graduates.

Barack Hussein Obama is the loudest voice calling other politicians all sorts of unflattering names. As well as objecting to any news organization that won't report his pablum as gospel.
"American democracy has thrived because we have recognized the need for a government that, while limited, can still help us adapt to a changing world.

Barack Hussein Obama has done more to increase the size of government than all the prior presidents. The United States government is no longer limited. The only thing that is limited is the freedom that the slaves citizens are allowed to have.
"We can't expect to solve our problems if all we do is tear each other down. You can disagree with a certain policy without demonizing the person who espouses it. You can question somebody's views and their judgment without questioning their motives or their patriotism."

There is no need to question Barack Hussein Obama's patriotism. Barack Hussein Obama has none. Why else would Barack Hussein Obama continually bow to foreign dignitaries? Why else would Barack Hussein Obama surround himself with people who hate the United States and all it stands for? Why else would Barack Hussein Obama push legislation that takes the right of choice away from the slaves citizens? Why else would Barack Hussein Obama look to increase the size of government whenever and wherever he can?
Obama swore in several dozen ROTC graduates, all in dress uniforms, during U-M's Saturday commencement.

Which is surprising, as Barack Hussein Obama normally prefers to swear at anything that remotely looks like the military. Which is why Barack Hussein Obama rushes to demonize white policemen doing their jobs, but rushes to defend Muslim terrorist who are only doing their jobs.

All in all a typical Barack Hussein Obama snow job. Barack Hussein Obama lying about his goals and dreams to impressionable young minds. Young minds that will shortly find out that Barack Hussein Obama (or any) socialists' dream do not include jobs for the well educated.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Economy Recovering. If You Ignore Homelessness, Joblessness And Business Failures.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703871904575215870609767844.html
Business Spending Propels Recovery
The U.S. economy grew at a slower pace in the first quarter, but the underlying trends—including a bigger share of growth from industry, strong consumer spending and low inflation—were encouraging.

The federal government and their minions and regulators destroyed the economy. Millions lost their jobs. Millions are facing losing their homes. Millions of businesses were closed.

Now the federal government is claiming that the economy is recovering?

Not by any rational, honest measure. Keep in mind that the federal government lies that when the size of government grows, that this is the same as the economy growing. But it is the exact opposite. When the size of the government grows, the size of the economy shrinks. The only thing the government produces is more regulation and inflation. When government regulation increases, this reduces the ability of businesses that produce products that consumers want to increase.

When the government talks about consumer spending increasing, they are lying again. Inflation is running rampant. Any increase in spending is because of inflation. It takes more money to buy less goods. Have you ever looked at how the government lies about inflation? Every year the government looks for any product that didn't increase in price and then uses that to prove there is no inflation. The current measure of inflation doesn't include food, transportation or housing. Obviously these are NOT things the average consumer needs, wants or uses. So it therefore must be fair for the government to exclude this items for their ever changing measure of what is inflation.

So the next time you see a report from any government liar about how the economy is improving, look around at all your unemployed friends and try to figure out how the economy could be improving when you and everyone you know is worse off.

Belgium Considers Standing Up For Women's Rights. Muslim Majority Opposes Women's Rights.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/30/AR2010043001527.html
Belgian vote on Muslim veils could echo in Europe
Belgium's vote to ban full face veils in public is the furthest any European country has gone to confront a tiny minority whose choice in clothing has come to symbolize the issue of integrating some Muslim minorities.

Integrating? I think the Muslim press has it wrong.

Women wearing burqas are not integrating into European society. Any woman who is ordered to, or wants to continue dressing and acting like a third class citizen (behind second class citizens-goats and sheep) should have that right. Those women and their owners should be able to exercise that right in any third world country where women without rights is the natural order. But in a modern educated, industrialized society, exceptions should not be made for barbaric customs of medieval religions that oppress women, children and members of other religions.

Pedophiles And Alien Invaders Protest Arizona's Protecting Rights Of Legal Citizens.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/us/01cardinal.html
Los Angeles Archbishop to Lead a Rally Against the Arizona Measure
Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, archbishop of Los Angeles, will be a leader of Saturday’s march in downtown Los Angeles, where tens of thousands of people are expected to protest Arizona’s new immigration law.

Just Gimme Some Truth.

Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, archbishop of Los Angeles, and protector of all pedophile priests is leading a protest. Roger M. Mahony, the Pope and the entire Roman Catholic Church spend years protecting the rights of every single priest who rapes children. The Roman Catholic Church moves the pedophiles from church to church, from state to state and from country to country to prevent prosecution by law enforcement agencies. So you know what kind of moral and legal ground church is standing on.

The Los Angeles Times is mis-characterizing the anti-illegal alien invasion laws as "Arizona’s new immigration law". Nothing could be further from the truth. Arizona's new law has nothing to do with legal immigration. The federal government already mis-handles immigration quite nicely own its' own. The state law simply allows the state to enforce the federal law (that the federal government refuses to enforce) that makes it a crime for an illegal alien to sneak across the border without going through the process that ALL legal visitors must go through.

So there should be no surprise that the American Civil Liberies Undermined (A.C.L.U.) is supporting the leftist / socialist mass media and the Barack Hussein Obama administration along with other many other criminal organizations who abhor and detest the thought that any American Citizen (not an alien invader) has any rights.

Using the logic of the criminals who are protesting for the rights of the criminals, it should be completely legal for the Mexican Army, or the drug lords or any armed militia to cross the United States border for any reason at any time.