Use A Camera, Go To Prison

http://gizmodo.com/5553765/are-cameras-the-new-guns
Are Cameras the New Guns?

In response to a flood of Facebook and YouTube videos that depict police abuse, a new trend in law enforcement is gaining popularity. In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer.

Thank god for this judicial ruling. This clears up so many misunderstandings. Previously I had thought that law enforcement agencies were supposed to prevent crime. Or if they can't prevent crime, at least capture the criminals who commit crimes.

Now I know better.

Criminals switch sides and become law enforcement officials so that they can commit crimes without worry of capture or punishment. It has become a more serious crime for law abiding citizens to record law enforcement personnel committing crimes than it is for law enforcement personnel to commit crimes. Of course, it is still a crime if a law abiding citizen did what a law enforcement official did. After all, we can't have lawlessness be the law of the land.

Let me review the situation: The courts have previously ruled that it is against the law to protect yourself from unlicensed and unregulated criminals. The courts are now ruling that documenting licensed and regulated criminals (police) is a crime.

My dream of living in a communist police state has come true. And I didn't even have to flee the country to achieve it!

California Assembly Moves To Protect Criminal's Rights.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/california/ci_15206327
California Assembly advances bill to ban carrying unloaded guns

Citing safety concerns, the Assembly passed a bill Tuesday that would make it illegal to openly carry a gun in public, even if it is unloaded.

Yup.

How can a rapist, a mugger, a bank robber, or a murderer ever be sure of their safety, if the average citizen is allowed to carry weapons? Allowing innocent victims to carry weapons and protect themselves from criminals makes the streets of California an unsafe working environment for your average criminal. And considering that in a budget saving move by legislators to release violent felons early and without oversight, allowing innocent victims to carry weapons, even unloaded weapons, sends the wrong message. How can California ever become the sanctuary state for criminals it hopes to be if it allows innocent victims to protect themselves?

Maybe it is time for the criminals to start their own union. That way, the criminals will have a dedicated organization standing up for their rights. While politicians normally tend to protect criminals rights, they are not as consistent about it as they should be. If the criminals can reward the legislators every time the legislators take a stand that protects the criminals rights over the rights of innocent victims, then we would have a more uniform standard of protecting criminals and harassing innocent victims and potential victims. In fact, a criminals union would be the one union that all politicians could join without compromising their morals. I am sure that all the violent criminals would be willing to allow all the non-violent criminals (politicians) to join. Or maybe all politicians would be honorary members because of their pro crime and anti victim and anti legal citizen activities.

Maybe even a new motto.

Commit a crime, become a politician.

Insult A Judge, Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/24/jailed.lawyer.richard.fine/?hpt=C1
Ex-lawyer jailed 14 months, but not charged with a crime

Once a dapper Beverly Hills attorney known for his bow tie, Richard Fine has been held in solitary confinement at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail for 14 months, even though he's never been charged with a crime.

The State of California and all their lackeys, minions, henchmen, ... have found the perfect way to subvert the constitution of the United States and intimidate anyone they want to.

Contempt of court. You can be thrown in jail for an indefinite period of time. No need to file any charges. No trial. No jury. No freedom.

Aren't you glad you live in the United States where you have the freedom to rot in prison for an indefinite period of time without being accused, charged or convicted of a crime?

100% Of Politicians Refuse To Act Responsibly Or Listen To The Voice Of The People.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0520-pot-poll-20100520,0,459933,print.story
49% of California voters back legalizing pot, poll finds

The poll, which surveyed 1,168 likely voters, found that 49% think marijuana use should be made legal, 48% do not and 3% do not know, suggesting that the proponents of the legalization measure will have to wage an expensive and persuasive campaign.

As Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the democrats and democrat wannabes have shown, it doesn't matter how many people in the United States are for or against any issue, the politicians will always act contrary to the will and the best interests of the people.

"All the polls continue to show that voters remain interested in replacing a failed policy with a more honest, commonsense solution," said Dan Newman, a campaign spokesman.

And all the politicians have continued to show their contempt for the public by promoting and passing dishonest and nonsensical solutions to real and imagined problems.

The original marijuana laws were created based on the same kind of junk science that is in use today by the "Global Warming" junk scientists. By junk science, I mean outright deception and fraud. Today, any reputable (honest) scientist who has studied marijuana knows that occasional marijuana use is less harmful to the individual and society than occasional use of alcohol or tobacco (both of which are legal).

Back in the 1930s when the racist media and the racist politicians passed their insane anti-marijuana laws, very few people smoked marijuana. And of the few that did smoke marijuana, most were minorities. After passage of the anti-marijuana laws, a whole new law enforcement agency, complete with weapons and contempt for the citizens started operation.

Before the anti-marijuana laws, the United States had the smallest number of criminals, the smallest number of prisons and the smallest number of armed thugs watching their citizens of any country on the planet. After the passage and enforcement of the anti-marijuana laws, the United States boasts the largest number of criminals, the largest number of prisons, and the largest number of armed thugs who are above the law and able to destroy citizens lives as well as create contempt for the corrupt government that enforces an irrational law. In fact, with the current budget problems, the government has has chosen to release violent criminals rather than release non-violent marijuana smokers.

Before the anti-marijuana laws, marijuana was grown by small numbers of individual growers or by the individuals who smoked. After passage of the anti-marijuana laws, entire countries (Mexico, Columbia, ...) have devoted their whole economy to growing marijuana. In fact, if you look at the Forbes 500 wealthiest men, you will now find drug lords on that list.

So you don't need to be worried that the government will start taking a rational approach to the drug problem (or any other problem). You can rest assured that the government will continue to create any crisis that it can in their eternal quest to grab more power and to increase the size of government and to oppress the people that they claim to represent.

California: Have A Child, Go To Prison.

http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/05/13/1932032/calif-bill-could-jail-parents.html
Calif. bill could jail parents if kids miss school

The bill would let prosecutors charge parents with misdemeanors punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine if their kids miss too much school. Judges could delay the punishment to parents as an incentive to get their children to class.

The idiots in Sacramento, have decide to try to do something (horribly wrong) to try to get young students to attend school more regularly.

Let me see if it is possible to understand the twisted, warped logic (if you can call it that) that the politicians used to come up with this bill.

It looks to me like the same logic that the politicians use to allows big business to sell cigarettes, but makes it illegal for the purchasers to smoke cigarettes.

There are a few facts that we should keep in mind while considering this problem (evidently facts that politicians are incapable of considering).

California (and the United States) is in the middle of the "great depression". The State of California doesn't have enough money to keep violent felons in jail. As part of their balance the budget, California is setting free violent felons to terrorize the citizens into paying higher taxes. The unemployment rate is higher than 10%. If you count the underemployed and the unemployed so long they no longer look for work or no longer get unemployment benefits, the unemployment rate is higher than 20%.

So in an effort to get young students to stop missing school, single parents will be fined $2,000 that they don't have. How you may ask, will this help young students to stop missing school?

Placing a large fine on someone who already is having problems paying their monthly bills will help convince the parent to stop working and go on government assistance. If you have no job, then you have no money for the government to steal with their higher fines, fees, taxes, ... This is part of the government's plan to make everyone a criminal, and thus to assess fines, fees, taxes to help balance the budget.

So in an effort to get young students to stop missing school, single parents will be throw in prison. How you may ask, will this help young students to stop missing school?

While the parent has been rotting in prison for a year, the child or children have been placed in foster care. Children in the foster care system have a higher than average death rate then children outside the foster care system. So it is possible that if more children die, the statistics for absenteeism will be lower because of the fewer number of children still alive to attend school.

If the child or children are not killed by the foster care system, then at the very least they will have been traumatized so much that they are more likely to become criminals. And thus the overburdened state, will have even more crime to deal with then they are currently willing to deal with.

What do you think will happen when the parent, in a single parent home is thrown in prison for a year?

After rotting in prison for a year, the parent is likely to be unemployed, and because of the "great depression" unemployable. So they will now go on welfare or some other assistance program paid for by the dwindling number of employed people.

And there you have it. The forward thinking that has made the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea the great countries that they have become.

Drop Your Drawers, Get Out Of Jail.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_14527013
Since 1970s, ID-theft victim has been dogged by someone else's "criminal" past

In more than 30 years of trying, St. Charles, Mo., lawyer Gary Stewart Heggs has found only one fail-safe way to quickly prove he isn't an escaped inmate from Colorado:
Dropping his drawers.

Here is yet another typical case of American justice.

A criminal steals some one else's wallet and identification. The criminal gets arrested. The criminal gets booked. The criminal gets tried. The criminal gets convicted. All using the stolen identification. The criminal manages to break out of jail and avoid recapture. Law enforcement and the criminal justice system send out arrest warrants for the fugitive under the name on the stolen identification. This happened in 1971. The man who had his identity stolen is still constantly arrested because the state couldn't be bothered to find out the real identity of criminal. The law enforcement agencies and criminal justice system are still looking for the criminal under the stolen identity. The law enforcement agencies and criminal justice system refuse to quash the arrest warrant because they refuse to admit they made a mistake. And because in this country the innocent citizen has no rights and no ability to defend himself against the all seeing, the all knowing, and the all incompetent police state.

The law enforcement agency and the criminal justice system can't be bothered to correctly identify the people they throw in jail.

And if the police state is willing to spend this much time and effort harassing an innocent man, you know they will exert even less care when administering the new national health care system they have just rammed down the throats of the vigorously protesting public.

Crime Stinks.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/nyc_cops_are_among_accused_rob.html
N.Y.C. cops are among accused robbers of Carlstadt perfume warehouse

Two New York City police officers are among five people charged with robbing about $1 million of perfume from a New Jersey warehouse.

Crime Stinks. So a couple of police officers are doing their part to change that. They helped steal $1 million of perfume.

Who says the police don't do anything for the community.

Pension Manager Charged With Planning Retirement.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/06/AR2010050606383.html
California charges former pension officials with fraud

California's attorney general is suing two former officials from Calpers, the nation's largest public pension fund, alleging that they took kickbacks in exchange for a piece of the fund's lucrative investment portfolio.

Why is the State of California upset that the managers of a public pension fund were working towards their retirement plan?

These two men were simply doing what they were paid to do. Planning their retirement. Of course they were not as careful as most politicians are in concealing their criminal activity when acting against the best interest of the people they were supposed to be serving. But isn't that what all politicians do? Accept bribes and payoffs to do the work of special interest groups against the interest of the voters who elected them. So they are being unfairly penalized for doing what comes naturally to the political crowd they work for.

But there is no need to worry. I am sure there are plenty of convicted white collar criminals in prison and unconvicted criminals in politics who could easily put forth the same amount of care and due diligence as this dynamic duo did. So their jobs and bribes are not in any danger.

In fact, I am looking forward to this level of care and concern from the Health Care Deform fraud that the fraud-in-chief has perpetrated on the American public.

Pedophiles And Alien Invaders Protest Arizona's Protecting Rights Of Legal Citizens.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/01/us/01cardinal.html
Los Angeles Archbishop to Lead a Rally Against the Arizona Measure

Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, archbishop of Los Angeles, will be a leader of Saturday’s march in downtown Los Angeles, where tens of thousands of people are expected to protest Arizona’s new immigration law.

Just Gimme Some Truth.

Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, archbishop of Los Angeles, and protector of all pedophile priests is leading a protest. Roger M. Mahony, the Pope and the entire Roman Catholic Church spend years protecting the rights of every single priest who rapes children. The Roman Catholic Church moves the pedophiles from church to church, from state to state and from country to country to prevent prosecution by law enforcement agencies. So you know what kind of moral and legal ground church is standing on.

The Los Angeles Times is mis-characterizing the anti-illegal alien invasion laws as "Arizona’s new immigration law". Nothing could be further from the truth. Arizona's new law has nothing to do with legal immigration. The federal government already mis-handles immigration quite nicely own its' own. The state law simply allows the state to enforce the federal law (that the federal government refuses to enforce) that makes it a crime for an illegal alien to sneak across the border without going through the process that ALL legal visitors must go through.

So there should be no surprise that the American Civil Liberies Undermined (A.C.L.U.) is supporting the leftist / socialist mass media and the Barack Hussein Obama administration along with other many other criminal organizations who abhor and detest the thought that any American Citizen (not an alien invader) has any rights.

Using the logic of the criminals who are protesting for the rights of the criminals, it should be completely legal for the Mexican Army, or the drug lords or any armed militia to cross the United States border for any reason at any time.

Obama Is An Incompetent Ignorant Illiterate Idiot.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/04/obama-there-may-not-be-an-appetite-for-immigration-bill-this-year/1
Obama: There 'may not be an appetite' for immigration bill this year

WRONG! This country is desperate for a rational criminal invasion bill. Which is exactly the opposite of what Barack Hussein Obama wants to do. So Barack Hussein Obama needs to wait a bit for the slaves citizens forget their anger at his last attack on the American way of life before planning and implementing his next attack on the American way of life.

"What I think is a mistake," Obama later said, "is when we start having local law enforcement officials empowered to stop people on the suspicion that they may be undocumented workers, because that carries a great amount of risk that core values that we all care about are breached."

Was Barack Hussein Obama born stupid, or did he have to work hard to get there?

Or is this just the latest assault on the truth that Barack Hussein Obama is famous for when he supports any issue?

I would like to think that Barack Hussein Obama has advisors who are capable of reading. I would like to think that Barack Hussein Obama is capable of reading. If they are, then that only leaves the fact that Barack Hussein Obama knows exactly what this bill says and does, but he is lying about it. Which is not surprising, as Barack Hussein Obama has fraudulently misrepresented EVERY issue he has EVER supported.

I wonder what core American values Barack Hussein Obama was supporting when he bailed out the Wall Street Wizards who contributed to his election campaign? Fraud and corruption!

I wonder what core American values Barack Hussein Obama was supporting when he nationalized the American health care system against the wishes of the majority of Americans? Socialism and the repeal of individual freedom of choice!

What core American values does Barack Hussein Obama think this law is breaking? Since the state law is eerily similar to the federal law on criminal alien invasion of the United States, does Barack Hussein Obama think the federal government is attacking the core American values that Barack Hussein Obama cares about?

Whether Congress can address the issue this year is an open question, Obama acknowledged. "We've gone through a very tough year, and I've been working Congress pretty hard."

How many times in one year can Barack Hussein Obama and his treasonous socialists minions subvert the Constitution of the United States and expect to get away with it?

What is tough about subverting the Constitution of the United States and the will of the majority of the American people? Barack Hussein Obama contemplates how to do this every time he gets up in the morning. The tough part of subverting the Constitution of the United States is how to brainwash the democrats (and the other weak minded individuals) into believing that what Barack Hussein Obama wants is good for the country. As stupid and as evil as the democrats are, they still somehow know that if they subvert the constitution too many times, they might not get reelected to do it again. So Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of his loyal minions don't want to pass too many more reprehensible laws that will further enrage the voting public against them.

U.S.Supreme Court Upholds Criminal Activity By Lower Court Judges.

http://www.slate.com/id/2251663/
Courting Disaster

When the U.S. Supreme Court denied Charles Dean Hood's appeal last week, it was done in a one-sentence, unsigned order. Long after the conclusion of the trial, it became clear that his trial judge and prosecutor had been secretly involved in a years-long extramarital affair.

I wonder if it was the wise Latina who helped set this precedent for the judicial system. In any case, it is good to know that the members of the ruling class are able to commit any crime they choose without fear of punishment.

Appeals rejected Hood's challenge in two curt sentences last September, finding that his lawyers had waited too long to raise the issue on appeal. How Hood was to have raised the conflict of interest when the existence of the affair was not conclusively established until 2008, when the judge and prosecutor were forced to admit it under oath, is not explained.

Equally encouraging is knowing there is a statue of limitations on criminal activities perpetrated by law enforcement officials. It would greatly upet the judicial system if erroneously convicted innocent people were allowed to appeal their conviction when evidence of judicial wrongdoing is discovered at a later date.

Health Deform Plan Working As Expected.

http://www.kansascity.com/2010/04/25/1902966/health-reform-gives-old-scam-a.html
Health reform gives old scam a new angle

In suburban St. Louis, a fellow was going from house to house saying he was from the government and he was there to help people — to obtain “ObamaCare” policies.

Everything that Barack Hussein Obama says about the Health Care Deform plan is a lie. Any time any body speaks the truth about the Health Care Deform plan, Barack Hussein Obama calls them liars. This is causing a lot of confusion among the faithful that want to believe the liars and want to disbelieve the truth tellers. This has helped Barack Hussein Obama with his new job creation program. A new class of con men has been created. This new class of con men are now openly scamming the public with more lies about the new Health Care Deform plans and how it can help the American Public.

So the next time anybody tells you that Barack Hussein Obama never created any jobs, you can point to this article and tell them how they are wrong.

Nero Fiddled While Rome Burned. The S.E.C. Yanked While The Economy Tanked.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/04/did-porn-cause-the-financial-crisis/39414/
Did Porn Cause the Financial Crisis?

The above headline might seem like a joke. It isn't. Senior staffers at the Securities and Exchange Commission were surfing Internet pornography when they should have been policing the financial system. A deeply disturbing SEC memo to Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) exposing this problem was reported Thursday night by ABC News.

Is this what they mean when they say the government is "hard at work"? The S.E.C. is "exposing" their newest problem? Did the S.E.C. work "hand in glove" with the businesses they were supposed to oversee? Is the S.E.C. going to wash their hands of this problem?

When they make a movie of this, the federal government and the S.E.C. may think of this as their finest hour, but the movie industry is more likely to think of this as "Romancing The Hand".

Congress is investigating Goldman Sachs to determine how the economic meltdown happened. Don't expect to see congress investigating the S.E.C. to find out why the S.E.C. who was overseeing Goldman Sachs for years let them get away with causing the economic meltdown.

It is too bad that federal government employees are not responsible for their actions. I would think that getting paid $200,000 or more per year should get at least a barely competent employee. But these are government employees, so barely competent is best we can ever expect. And of course, none of these people will ever be punished for gross negligence or held responsible for what they did.

But any regulator who can be bribed with a subscription to an Internet porn site should be willing to work for the federal government for a heck of a lot less money than they are currently being paid.

If this is how the federal government oversees the economy, I think we know what to expect when the federal government oversees the health care industry.

Criminals Object To State Enforcement Of Federal Law.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i4nY72M0hFVOHUzIrqYpD67DoBxgD9F8NAG00
Ariz. gov. to act on immigration enforcement bill

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer on Friday neared a deadline to act on the nation's toughest legislation against illegal immigration.

The sweeping measure would make it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal.

What is the world coming to when a state wants to enforce a federal law that the federal government won't repeal but won't enforce?

We are not talking about rape, or robbery, or kidnapping or not buying health insurance. We are talking about a crime that in foreign countries you can get put in prison for 10 or more years and face a heavy monetary penalty. We are talking about entering this country without asking permission.

Civil rights activists have said the bill would lead to racial profiling and deter Hispanics from reporting crimes.

This is terrible. It may discourage criminals from reporting crimes. I know I want the police to protected drug smugglers who get ripped off by other drug smugglers or their customers.

Hundreds of Hispanics protested the legislation at the State Capitol complex on Thursday.

Were any of the protesters criminals who crossed the federal border illegally?

But the civil rights activists and the criminals may have a point. Maybe the illegal aliens shouldn't have to obey the law of the land. If so, then I want to see murderers and rapists stand up for their right to break the law. Maybe tax cheats shouldn't have to obey the tax laws (although tax cheats appointed by Barack Hussein Obama already have the right to disobey the law). Maybe people without health insurance shouldn't have to buy insurance?

Other provisions of the bill allow lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.

But this law goes too far. It makes it a state crime for the federal government to prevent enforcement of federal law by state agencies.

How can the average citizen (non-criminal) complain about the capricious and arbitrary nature of the law, if the state government is allowed to enforce federal laws that the federal government has chosen to turn a blind eye to "don't ask, don't tell".

Brewer's predecessor, Janet Napolitano, a Democrat who is now President Barack Obama's Homeland Security secretary, vetoed proposals similar to the bill just approved by the Legislature.

Evidently, Janet Napolitano believes it is better to criminalize otherwise law abiding United States citizens, and allow illegal aliens the right to collect welfare, health care, and any other government giveaway program that United States citizens must pay for.

Others urging Brewer to veto the bill include Catholic bishops, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, and Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for governor. Mexico's embassy also has voiced concerns about racial profiling.

It is good to know that Washington, District of Criminals (D.C.) are not the only hypocrites on this continent. Mexico, has much harsher illegal immigration laws. Illegal aliens in Mexico are felons who get a jail term before getting deported.

But the real bottom line, is that the federal government is NOT interested in protecting the citizens of the United States. The federal government is ONLY interested in getting more power. The federal government is ONLY interested in taking away the rights of legal citizens. The federal government is ONLY interested in getting more laws on the books that they don't plan on enforcing so that if they ever want to arbitrarily prosecute someone they will have the laws ready and waiting for them.

This just goes to show that there is a reason one of the three biggest lies told on a regular basis is:
I'm from the government and I am here to help.

What Is The Best Profession For Pedophiles?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/us/19abuse.html
Pediatrician Charged With Rape Was Once Cleared by Hospital

Officials at a hospital here say that they investigated a 1996 complaint against a pediatrician now charged with sexually abusing more than 100 patients, but that the doctor was cleared of any wrongdoing.

What is the best profession for a pedophile? Priest? Doctor?

In 1996, the Beebe Medical Center investigated a doctor accused of inappropriate behavior with patients. As with most internal investigations, the doctor was cleared of all wrong doing. Unfortunately for the doctor, the Beebe Medical Center was unable to prevent the local law enforcement agency investigating more complaints. And the local law enforcement agency is now prosecuting the doctor for more than 100 sexual attacks on children.

When the church finds out about a priest who rapes children, the church covers up the problem by moving the priest to another church. No matter how many times the priest is caught. There is always another church the priest can be moved to. And if the local law enforcement agencies start investigating, the church can always move the priest to another country where the priest can continue molesting children.

So, if you are a pedophile looking for a career that provides you with the most opportunity of meeting and raping children (and getting away without being punished), then becoming a priest is the only reasonable choice.

Left Wing Takeover Of Country Is Inciting Right Wing Reaction.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/16/clinton-warns-tea-party-anger-incite-right-wing-extremism/
Bill Clinton Warns Tea Party Anger Could Incite Right-Wing Extremism
As usual, the left wing extremists must mis-characterize what is happening around them.

This news article quotes Bill Clinton (who seemed to think that the White House was his private hunting preserve for sex with subordinates) talking about something other than sex. So right off my B.S. detector is screaming at me to ignore everything he says. Right now, the only thing I might think that Bill Clinton is an expert on, and is capable of talking about, is as a spokesman for any porn actress or Tiger Woods.

The Bill Clinton starts off talking about the anger of the Tea Party movement without putting it into context. The justified anger of the Tea Party movement, is against the criminal take over the of United States by left wing extremists who hate American and are doing everything they can to subvert the constitution and the bill of rights. For those of you of you that think I am exaggerating, you might want to try reading a history book. This country was founded by people fleeing Europe and England that didn't want to be told how to pray who to pray to. The American revolution was caused because the government (England) felt that the rights of the government was more important than the rights of the people. If you think you have any rights, other than to pay higher taxes, you are sadly mistaken.

Like any good left wing extremist, Bill Clinton has no facts to back up his position, so he uses unfounded accusations to bolster his position. The Oaklahoma bomber has as much in common with the Tea Party movement, as the average burglar or robber does with Barack Hussein Obama's goal to redistribute the wealth from those that have it to those that don't.

California Justice. Free The Rapists And Killers. Imprison The Pot Smokers.

http://www.taxcannabis.org/index.php/pages/public-safety-benefits-fact-sheet

California’s Legal System Has its Priorities Wrong

According to the FBI, in 2008, almost 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved in California. That same year, over 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor cannabis possession.

What is wrong with these numbers?

According to the State of California, nothing.

If the police state arrest an individual for a violent crime, it costs the police State of California a lot of money for the capture, prosecution and imprisoning of that individual.

If the police state arrest an individual for a drug crime, they can confiscate all the criminals private property. Which means that the police State of California might even be able to break even or make a profit on the arrest of non-violent criminals.

The State of California is in the middle of a budget crisis. By following the advice of the Federal Reserve Board and other economists that Barack Hussein Obama trusts with the economy of the United States, the State of California is spending more than it collects in fees, taxes, permits, contributions, confiscations, ... Unlike the federal government, the State of California is unable to print more money. So the State of California needs some other way to balance the budget. So by ignoring violent crime in favor of non-violent drug crime, the State of California may be able to save a few million dollars. If you are a politician it is very easy to justify criminalizing a large portion of the population and endangering the rest of the population (by not investigating violent crime or letting prisoners go free early) in order to save a few million dollars (when you are billions short).

The California Senate Wants College Students To Die Of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/12/AR2010041203411.html
Calif. bill requires home carbon monoxide monitors

Monitors that detect the odorless, lethal gas already are required in new homes. The bill would extend the requirement to all houses, apartments and condominiums meeting the requirement but would exempt college dorms at state colleges and universities.

The California Senate decided that as part of any advanced education, students should be afforded the opportunity to die of carbon monoxide poisoning. After all, college and university students don't pay taxes. College and university students are a drain on society because of their wasteful spending habits and reckless borrowing. With the State of California having the highest unemployment rate in the country, even if the college and university students could graduate, they wouldn't be able to get job to repay their student loans, so they would only end up on welfare. So it is no loss if the college and university students don't live to graduate.

Property owned or leased by the state, including California State University and community college campuses, the University of California or a local government agency would be exempt. Those college dorms are not part of the mandate because of the projected cost to the state for installing the monitors.

Funny, but the State of California seems to think that their inability to pay is a reasonable excuse to exempt them from a law that they want to enforce on a majority of the slaves citizens who are in equal or worse financial shape.

Then again, could it be simply that the State of California is not required to obey any laws that it makes for the slaves citizens?

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa Announced That Los Angeles Is Now A Sanctuary City For Murderers.

http://www.kfiam640.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=153218&article=6983620
Budget Cuts Impact Murder Investigations

It was a tough decision. But Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was up to the task. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is well known for making the tough decisions. Like determining which news reporters to sleep with so his wife won't find out. Like determining which foreign cities to tour for his weekly vacations while pretending that this is work related. Like determining what pretext he can use to speed up the bankrupting ruining running the city.

The City of Los Angeles is running short of funds. Since it is obvious to everyone except the politicians, (that all the elected officials are in the pocket of the unions and special interest groups), that something must be done to force the taxpaying public to to give up everything they own to the city to prevent the bankruptcy of this great welfare city of ours. The politicians seem to have come up with a solution that is finding favor at the state levels where politicians are also trying to come up with the best way to punish the slaves citizens who are silly enough to believe that if they have a job and get paid they deserve to keep their earnings rather than pay them over to be mismanaged by the corrupt incompetent politicians.

The politicians at the state level have decided that giving violent criminals early release from prison is a great way to save money. The City of Los Angeles, a leader in innovation, has decided that you don't have to release violent criminals early if you never arrest them. In a budget saving cost cutting measure, the City of Los Angeles, is preventing police from investigating murders.

This will teach the slaves citizens never to disagree with their owners masters political leaders.

Marijuana Economy?

http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/the-latest-threat-to-the-california-economy-legalizing-pot/19421390/
Would Legalized Pot Threaten California's Economy?

Of course legalizing pot would threaten California's economy.

But not how you think?

Legalizing pot could give the California economy a kick start on the road to economic recovery. Currently pot sells for outrageous amounts of money. So very few people are willing to risk the expense and legal hassles to produce pot. If you legalize pot growing and sales and smoking, then more people would start businesses to grow and sell pot. This would cause the cost of production and distribution to drop to the point that a pack of pot cigarettes might not cost much more than a pack of tobacco cigarettes. At which point a lot more people would be willing to smoke pot. It could be taxed the same way tobacco cigarettes and alcohol are taxed. So not only would legalizing pot start California on the road to economic recovery, but the vast amount of additional taxes that could be collected by the state, might even be enough to prevent the State of California from going bankrupt.

Fortunately, the California politicians know better than to offend the socialists, the "green movement" and the "Global Warming" faithful who fund their election campaigns. Fortunately, the California politicians know better than to do anything that might cause the creation of new businesses or delay the increase in taxes on the slaves citizens of the growing police state. So the California politicians will never legalize pot growing, sale or distribution. The politicians will instead vote down legalization. They will vote to increase the police enforcement of existing laws. They will enact laws to confiscate anything that the pot growers and sellers own. And then the politicians will vote themselves a raise for a job well done.

That is how government works.