L.A. County Officials Demonstrate Support For Stupid Peoples Rights By Proposing And Supporting Stupid Legislation.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/immigration/la-me-0528-supes-arizona-20100528,0,1828102,print.story
L.A. County official calls for boycott of Arizona over its immigration law

Molina spokeswoman Roxane Marquez said the supervisor realizes that the immigration system is broken but believes that the Arizona law is the wrong way to address the problem.

Spokeswoman Roxane Marquez is as much a liar as Los Angeles County Supervisor Gloria Molina is when they claim that they believe the immigration system is broken.

How can people who believe in giving alien invaders more rights than legal citizens claim that the system is broken. As leaders in the movement to have Mexico annex California back to it's rightful owners, Los Angeles County Supervisors Gloria Molina and Zev Yaroslavsky have shown their contempt for the laws and the opportunities provided by the United States. Rather than advocating general lawlessness on the part of alien invaders and legal citizens, Los Angeles County Supervisors Gloria Molina and Zev Yaroslavsky should be doing something positive and legal. Like repealing special order 40, which makes it a crime for police offices to ask about the citizenship status of criminals. Like stop making Los Angeles a sanctuary city for alien invaders and criminals. Like balancing the budget before the city goes bankrupt. Like stop accepting bribes from special interest groups. Like fighting California bill AB 32, the Climate Change Final Solution which is about to start killing the economy (and taxing legal citizens to death) in a futile effort to affect "Global Warming" (which is fraud and a hoax perpetrated by power hungry politicians that want to micromanage every body's lives).

Obama Pretends To Care About Security Of The United States.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20100526/cm_csm/304111/print
Obama orders troops to Mexico border, exposing politics of illegal immigration

President Obama’s pursuit of immigration reform this year is pushing him in directions he may not have intended to go.

That is putting it mildly.

Immigration reform? If you call amnesty for alien invaders immigration reform, then you might be right. On the surface, it might look like Barack Hussein Obama is doing something he abhors.

Barack Hussein Obama is looking forward to the alien invaders voting for him in the next election. But to get that vote, he needs to ram through an amnesty bill before his reelection. But after ramming through the Health Care Deform bill, the country, and even some of the democrats are starting to be concerned with Barack Hussein Obama's plan for the ultimate destruction of the constitution and the bill of rights. If Barack Hussein Obama keeps pushing as hard as he has been, even the democrats that support him are starting to question his motives and his goals.

His administration claims it is doing enough to guard the US-Mexico border.

Yup. No fences. No guards. Seems like a reason plan to me to protect the United States borders. It seems to be working very well to keep out Muslim terrorists.

On Wednesday, however, Mr. Obama quietly relented to requests from Republican and some Democratic lawmakers for even more security. He ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to support the US Border Patrol and asked Congress for an additional $500 million for enforcement.

Of course Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the politicians know this is strictly theater of the absurd. This minuscule amount of money and troops is completely inadequate to deal with the hundreds of thousands of new alien invaders crossing the border every year. When you factor in the drug lords and their army of smugglers, you begin to see how worthless the face saving stunt really is.

Obama is trying to walk a fine line between those seeking more border security and those seeking to legalize some 10 million illegal aliens in the US.

Barack Hussein Obama needs to legalize the newest group of alien invaders now. His recent political sabotage of the American dream has turned millions of American against him and the democrats. If Barack Hussein Obama waits too long, the millions of alien invaders will turn into tens of millions of alien invaders. And even the democrats might start to wonder about the rationality of providing amnesty and welfare to that many more people when our failing economy can't afford to support the alien invaders and the legal citizens that are already here.

Obama Responds To Oil Spill By Asking For Handouts To Help Democrats.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/05/obama-raises-money-in-californ.html?wprss=44
Obama raises money in California

Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

Barack Hussein Obama campaigned for democrats while the oil spill washed up on American shores.

"I said to them, 'I disagree with this Arizona law,' " Obama said, adding that he also told them he understood their frustration over the nation's porous southwestern border.

Barack Hussein Obama promised to continue to oppose the Arizona law until he had a chance to read it and confirm that it is as racist as everybody else who hasn't read the law says it is.

Barack Hussein Obama also commiserated with the alien invaders in Arizona who now face punishment for their crime of illegally crossing the United States border. Barack Hussein Obama promised the alien invaders that the legal citizens of Arizona wouldn't benefit from their new law. Barack Hussein Obama told the legal citizens of Arizona to quit their whining and get back to work and paying taxes so B.O. could appoint more czars, more commissars, and bail out more businesses that are too big to fail.

Obama told the audience Tuesday that the government must "revisit how these oil companies are operating."

Barack Hussein Obama promised to have a back room deal finalized in no time with a 2,000+ page bill to reform the oil industry. After all, it has worked so well for saving the economy and reforming health care, it should work for all the other problems that Barack Hussein Obama is creating in the United States.

With the economy showing signs of life, Obama has said Republicans are asking for the keys to the car back, now that the Democrats have pulled it out of the ditch.

Barack Hussein Obama compared the economy to a car that the prior administration has run into a ditch. He then claimed that the Democrats have pulled the car out of the ditch. However, as I see it, setting the car on fire, so that it explodes, thus moving itself out of the ditch is not a good long term solution for getting the economy back on track.

Seeing as how Barack Hussein Obama is so literary, I think I should use another metaphor for the state of the economy.

The current economy is like a dead cat. If you drop it from high enough, it will bounce. But that bounce is not a sign of life. The cat is still dead.

Live Female Births Increase Prostitution.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/26/AR2010052601200.html
Arizona immigration law will boost crime in U.S. cities, police chiefs say

Arizona's new crackdown on illegal immigration will increase crime in U.S. cities, not reduce it, by driving a wedge between police and immigrant communities, police chiefs from several of the state's and the nation's largest cities said Tuesday.

Yup. Enforcing laws will increase crime. Therefore, we need to make everything legal. Rape, murder, burglary, ... Once there are no more laws, then it will not be possible to break any laws, and therefore, there will be no more crime.

At which point we can dissolve all law enforcement agencies. At which point, we won't need all the criminal rights groups working to subvert the United States. Because at that point, there will no longer be the United States. We will simply be a western version of the totalitarian dictatorships of the eastern block communist countries. Or we will be the northern version of the brutal and corrupt South American regimes.

The new Arizona law will intimidate crime victims and witnesses who are illegal immigrants and divert police from investigating more serious crimes, chiefs from Los Angeles, Houston and Philadelphia said.

More serious crime? Does that mean that the various law enforcement agencies see an alien invasion as a less serious crime. There are plenty of other federal crimes that the police state enforces. Try smoking a marijuana cigarette in a public place.

Which brings up the question, which laws are the police state planning on enforcing, and which laws are the police state planning on ignoring? If the federal and police state get to pick and choose which laws they will enforce, then can I pick and choose which laws I wish to obey?

Currently, federal law makes it a federal crime for an individual, or millions of individuals, to enter this country illegally. Making a federal crime a state crime doesn't change anything. Other than allowing the state to enforce a law that the federal government, through corruption, or incompetence refuses to enforce.

The American Civil Liberties Union, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and other civil rights groups have filed lawsuits to block the Arizona law, arguing that the Constitution preempts states from enforcing federal law and that the measure will lead to racial profiling.

If enforcing laws that protect American borders from alien invaders leads to racial profiling, then being born female leads to prostitution. Show me one female prostitute who was not born a woman. Then being born with a tongue leads to racial slurs. Show me any racist shouting ethnic slurs who was born without a tongue. Then going to school causes brain damage. Show me one criminal rights activist who didn't go to school.

Requiring the Los Angeles Police Department to prioritize the arrest of 400,000 illegal immigrants among the city's 4.1 million residents would "cripple us and make it impossible for us to do our jobs," Beck said.

Now I understand the police state. If millions of criminals break the law, the police state should not enforce that law. However, if hundreds or thousands of people break the law they should be punished. Arbitrary and capricious enforcement of the laws will lead to more respect for the police state.

Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas Manger said directing officers to spend hours investigating the immigration status of every person stopped with a suspect identification card would mean less time to catch violent criminals.

Actually, in California there is no need to catch violent criminals. In case you haven't heard, California is one of the leaders in the federally inspired program "race to bankruptcy" that is sweeping the nation. Already California, in a effort to save money has instituted the "catch and release" program for violent felons. The "catch and release" program requires the state of California to spend millions of dollars to catch and prosecute violent felons. And then set the violent criminals free without any jail time because the jails are already overflowing with non-violent offenders (jay walkers, pot smokers, ...).

"We understand and agree: Federal immigration law, the whole system, is broken, and that people are very, very frustrated all across this country," Harris said. "But this state law doesn't solve the immigration problems for the country. The solution is here in Washington, D.C., and Congress must step forward and come up with a comprehensive immigration reform that will really solve the problem."

As Washington, District of Criminals (D.C.), and Congress have so ably shown with the passage of the Health Care Deform bill, they are incapable of creating a solution that is NOT worse than the problem. So telling the country to wait few hundred years for Washington, District of Criminals (D.C.), and Congress to solve the alien invasion problem, is like asking someone stuck in quicksand to wait while an investigative committee is formed to study the problem. It is like politely asking North Korea to stop developing nuclear weapons. It is like politely asking Iran to stop developing nuclear weapons. It is like politely asking Muslim Terrorists to stop killing infidels. It is like politely asking politicians to stop taking bribes and actually do the job they were elected and promised they would do while running for office.

Mexican Nationals And Democratic Traitors Gave Mexican President Calderon A Standing Ovation At The Joint Session Of Congress.

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/21/2766429/republicans-criticize-calderons.html
Republicans criticize Calderon's speech to Congress

What has Mexican President Felipe Calderón Learned From Obama?
That you can never go wrong by criticizing America, and everything that it is, and everything that it stands for.

In his 40-minute address, Calderón sharply criticized Arizona's tough new immigration law and the United States' refusal to ban assault weapons, which are being used in the violent drug-gang shootouts in Mexico.

Evidently Mexican President Felipe Calderón has learned from international disgrace Barack Hussein Obama that you can never go wrong when lying to the politicians in the Washington District of Criminals (D.C.). So, much like every speech that Barack Hussein Obama has ever made, Mexican President Felipe Calderón's speech did not contain any truth. Which means that Mexican President Felipe Calderón's speech was 100% lies. In fact, Mexican President Felipe Calderón's speech was so full of lies, I was wondering if he had been coached by Barack Hussein Obama on what to say.

The new Arizona anti-alien invasion law simply says, that state, city and local police are now required to enforce the federal law. (Barack Hussein Obama and his gang of czars and commissars are all 100% against the Arizona law, and are very proud of having never even read or understood the Arizona or the federal law.) What Mexican President Felipe Calderón conveniently ignores, is that Mexico ruthlessly enforces their anti-immigration laws in ways that all third world dictatorships and dictator supporters and dictator wannabes (Barack Hussein Obama) applaud. What the hypocrites in California (and the rest of the United States) choose to ignore, is that California has the same law on their books. But since most California politicians (and most democrats and socialists) are used to breaking the law with immunity from prosecution, they tend to forget what laws are currently on the books or even what having laws is all about. Let's think about that for a moment. Millions of Mexican citizens are illegally leaving Mexico. Try to think about millions of American citizens fleeing the United States into Mexico or Canada.

Continuing on with his lies, Mexican President Felipe Calderón complained about the United States refusal to ban assault weapons. Again this conveniently ignores reality. Most of the assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug gangs were given to gangsters by the Mexican government. Actually, to be more honest than Mexican President Felipe Calderón and Barack Hussein Obama combined, the corrupt, ruthless Mexican government has an army. Most of the people who join the army, quit and join the drug cartels as soon as they are issued assault weapons. Let's think about that for a moment. Try to think about thousands of American citizens joing the army, and quitting to join the mafia after being issued assault weapons.

A Democratic plan, unveiled April 29, would create a path to citizenship for most of the estimated 10.8 million people who are in this country illegally now and would provide stronger security along the U.S.-Mexican border. The security features are aimed at wooing Republicans, who have said that security is their top priority.

Path to citizenship? I am glad to know that any time Osama Bin Laden and any other Muslim terrorist who learns to speak Spanish and manages to sneak across the United States border has a clear shot at becoming a United States citizen without having to worry about anyone questioning their past.

Since when has allowing invading aliens provided any country with stronger security for the nation being invaded? I can see how Mexico likes the American amnesty plan. Most corrupt and brutal regimes are concerned when millions of their citizens manage to flee to foreign countries. Fortunately for Mexico, they have a good friend in the United States. Mexico knows that the United States is in the process of becoming the exact same corrupt and brutal regime that Mexico already is. So Mexico knows that the millions fleeing their country will soon be no better off then before they illegally fled their homeland.

Although I do wonder. Has giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens in past been what caused the strong borders that the United States currently has?

Arizona Leads The Way To Boycott California And Other States That Provide Sanctuary For Alien Invaders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/17/arizona-boycott-battle-immigration-law-opponents/
Arizona in Boycott Battle With Immigration Law Opponents

Supporters of Arizona's controversial immigration law are trying to turn the tables on those calling for boycotts of their state, threatening to target opponents of the law with boycotts of their own.

Fortunately for the State of California, there is no one employed by the government that actually cares about the economy or the citizens.

There are very few things that the State of California (and the various cities) care about.

The government lackeys ONLY care about increasing the size of their salaries and retirement benefits. Even though California has been harder hit by the "great depression" than most other states, most government workers have demanded and continue to receive larger than average salaries and benefits rather than adjust to the fact that they are running out of taxpaying citizens to fund their lavish lifestyles. Most government workers continue to get raises and benefits increases most citizen lose their jobs.

The government lackeys ONLY care about providing increasing care and benefits for alien invaders. It is against federal law to harbor fugitives from federal crimes, but the state, along with most cities have announced that they will be safe havens for any criminal that chooses to invade this country and demand the rights that are denied to the average citizen.

The government lackeys ONLY care about breaking federal and state laws. The State of California has on the books a law that says ALL law enforcement officials will assist the federal government in capturing and holding alien invaders. Some of the cites have announced that they are sanctuary cities for the criminal invaders. Some of the cities have passed laws making it a crime to assist the federal government to detain criminal invaders.

The government lackeys ONLY care about destroying the economy of California. The government lackeys claim it is good for the environment. But how can causing businesses to flee the state be good for the environment or the economy? How can causing businesses that can't afford to flee the state to fire employees be good for the environment or the economy? How can all these moves to reduce the tax base of the state at the same time the cities and state are actively encouraging criminal invaders without jobs to relocate to California be good for the environment or the economy? How can starting an economic war against Arizona be good for the environment or the economy?

Los Angeles City Council Stands Up For Alien Invaders Rights.

http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/topofthetimes/callocal/la-me-0513-arizona-boycott-20100513,0,5835670,print.story
L.A. council bans most official travel to Arizona

Members, arguing that the new immigration law could lead to racial profiling, also vote to bar future city contracts with companies in that state.

Paying politicians to work, could lead to bribery. However, that doesn't seem to concern the corrupt incompetent idiots who are wasting the time and money of the City of Los Angeles in poorly thought out legislation designed to appease the alien invaders and hurt legitimate legal citizens of the State of Arizona.

Council members argued that a new Arizona law, which will make it a state crime to lack immigration papers and requires police to determine whether people they stop are in the country illegally, would lead to racial profiling and discrimination.

All modern criminals and drug addicts started out drinking their mothers milk. So, because any child that starts their life by drinking their mothers milk could become a criminal, we should make it a crime to breastfeed children.

The State of Arizona passed a law making it legal for the state police to enforce the federal anti-alien invasion laws. Since the City Council of Los Angeles is effectively objecting to the State of Arizona enforcing the federal law, I have to wonder what the City Council of Los Angeles are really thinking? Does the City Council of Los Angeles want federal law enforcement officials on every street corner enforcing the federal alien invasion laws? Or does the City Council of Los Angeles want any well armed and well stocked invading army to have the right to cross the United States borders and occupy whatever land they want?

During a morning-long debate on the resolution, council members compared Arizona's action to those of Nazi Germany and the beginning of the Holocaust, as well as the internment and deportation of Japanese Americans during World War II.

It is a good thing that most of the City Council are stupid, barely literate graduates of the public education system, or they would be unable to mischaracterize the Arizona anti-alien invasion laws. It is a good thing that the alien invaders have a lot of support from the mass media and from more misguided, uneducated graduates of the worst educational system in the United States. Otherwise the politicians would have to admit that they are simply grandstanding for effect, and that their actions in opposing the legal efforts to prevent the invasion of the United States are misguided at best, and treasonous at worst.

"Los Angeles is the second-largest city in this country, an immigrant city, an international city. It needs to have its voice heard," said Councilman Ed Reyes, one of the resolution's sponsors. "As an American, I cannot go to Arizona today without a passport. If I come across an officer who's having a bad day and feels that the picture on my ID is not me, I can be … deported, no questions asked. That is not American."

Personally, I think that it would be a good idea to deport ALL politicians who have served more than one term in office.

But that is NOT what the law says.

But fortunately for Councilman Ed Reyes (and the rest of the City Council), it is not a crime to mischaracterize and defame some other state for trying to deal with a major problem that is destroying the United States.

Fortunately it is not a crime for politicians to accept bribes from special interest groups. Or Councilman Ed Reyes and the rest of the criminal elite (otherwise known as politicians) should be spending time in prison for acting contrary to the best interests of the citizens who actually elected him and the rest of the criminal elite.

Still, a national opinion poll released Wednesday found that most Americans support Arizona's crackdown. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found that 59% of adults surveyed gave their overall approval to the Arizona law.

What I don't understand, is why don't the opinion poll takers ever ask the alien invaders their feeling on the subject. If they did, then the criminal elite (politicians and mass media) could at least have some basis for their treasonous attempts to overthrow the laws governing the United States.

That has not stopped a number of U.S. cities from calling for an economic boycott of Arizona. On Tuesday, San Francisco's Board of Supervisors approved a resolution similar to L.A's.

And it certainly makes sense that San Francisco, a sanctuary city for alien invaders, is held up as the example that all alien invaders look up to.

Councilwoman Janice Hahn, one of the co-sponsors of the motion and a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, said her office has been flooded with "hate calls and hate e-mails" criticizing the resolution. But, she said, "we know bad things happened when good people don't stand up and say something."

As a democrat, Councilwoman Janice Hahn certainly has plenty of experience in creating and implementing bad things.

The City Council imposed similar economic sanctions to protest South Africa's apartheid policies and Colorado's 1992 repeal of local ordinances that banned discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The City of Los Angeles is going bankrupt because the anti-business anti-legal citizen bias of the City Council. The City Council refuses to actually do anything to solve this problem. However, the City Council has more than enough time to criticize other cities, states and countries for not acting according to the whims of the incompetent City Council.

Officials with the Port of Los Angeles and Los Angeles International Airport have expressed concerns that severing all contracts could hurt those facilities' operations. The council resolution asks the commissions overseeing the port, airport and Department of Water and Power to review all contracts with ties to Arizona.

The City Council council doesn't need to worry about hurting the local economy. They have never worried about the citizens or the economy before, so there is no need for them to start now. As the corrupt, incompetent, special interest representing criminal elite, the politicians are only doing the job they were bribed to do. So the City Council has no problem acting against the best interests of the legal citizens of the City of Los Angeles.

However.

It would be nice if all the brainless criminal apologists tried sneaking across the southern border into Mexico and started demanding their rights. They would shortly find out what harsh criminal trespass and alien invader laws really were.

After Arizona, Why Are So Few States Considering Immigration Bills?

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2010/0510/After-Arizona-why-are-10-states-considering-immigration-bills
After Arizona, why are 10 states considering immigration bills?

Given the anger sparked by Arizona's immigration bill nationwide – including protests and calls to boycott Arizona – the campaign promises of Colorado gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis could be seen as a bit of a surprise.

Surprise to who?

If the mass media were honest and balanced, there would be no surprise that a number of additional states (with the support of the majority of the people) are looking to enforce the laws that the federal government conveniently chooses to ignore.

The real question is, who is participating in the protests and boycott of Arizona?

Is it the average American citizen, who simply wants a safe environment to work and raise a family? No.

Is it the socialist / liberal / democrat (Barack Hussein Obama along with his czars and commissars) that thinks the new alien invaders, once given amnesty will vote for their political agenda? Yes.

Is it the mass media which believes that the socialist / liberal / democrat (Barack Hussein Obama along with his czars and commissars) will bail them out when their support for the reprehensible extremists looses them so many subscribers / viewers that they can't make a profit any more? Yes.

Is it the illegal aliens who have invaded this country? Yes.

Is it the Mexican government which is so corrupt and inefficient that they are glad to get rid of the millions of citizens they can't manage or care for? Yes.

One of the favorite lies that Barack Hussein Obama (along with his czars and commissars) uses to defend his lack of enforcement of the alien invader laws, is that it is unAmerican to refuse to accept people illegally entering the United States.

Because Barack Hussein Obama (along with his czars and commissars) hate America and doesn't know anything about history that hasn't been rewritten by a socialist, they are completely unaware (or they are choosing to ignore anything that proves him wrong) that he is wrong.

Did the United States ever turn away people seeking political asylum who were fleeing a genocidal regime, and who were later killed upon their return to that country? In 1939 the United States did just that.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/stlouis.html
The Tragedy of the S.S. St. Louis

So when Barack Hussein Obama (along with his czars and commissars) talks about the United States needing to accept migrant workers looking for a better job, he is either ignorant or dishonest. Or both.

The United States had no problem back in 1939 in rejecting people fleeing a murderous regime intent on killing them along with millions of others. In fact, the murderous regime accepted as proof that the United States agreed with them that killing undesirables was acceptable because the United States refused admittance to the refugees.

So while Barack Hussein Obama (along with his czars and commissars) continues to pretend that ignoring the alien invader problem is the right thing to do, the citizens of the United States are preparing to fight back in any way they can.

Obama Calls On All Democrats To Provide Amnesty For All Alien Invaders.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/05/05/obama.immigration.reform/
Obama calls on Congress to work on immigration reform

Barack Hussein Obama, continuing the tradition he started when he first started running for the presidency, polluted the airwaves with more of the lies and deceit that he has become so well known for.

President Obama on Wednesday called on Congress to work on comprehensive immigration reform this year, saying it would be the best way to fix the nation's broken immigration system.

If Arizona is allowed to get away with enforcing federal alien invaders laws, other states may follow suit by passing similar laws. If enough states decide to start enforcing federal alien invader laws, then the illegal alien vote won't be available to help Barack Hussein Obama get reelected in 2012. Barack Hussein Obama needs the illegal alien vote because of the number of voters he is losing because of the massive fraud used to pass the stimulus / bailout (welfare for the wealthy) and the takeover of the health care industry (health care deform) while allowing the economy of the United States to crumble into ruins.

If federal amnesty immigration law gets fixed in the same way that the health care industry gets fixed, we will soon have armies of people marching into the United States from south of the border.

"The answer isn't to undermine fundamental principles that define us as a nation," Obama said to applause. He called instead for "common-sense comprehensive immigration reform."

If the answer is NOT to undermine fundamental principles that define the nation, why is Barack Hussein Obama so willing to subvert the Constitution of the United States to get his pet projects (that the majority of the citizens of the United States are rightfully against) passed? If the answer is NOT to undermine fundamental principles that define the nation, why is Barack Hussein Obama rushing to convert the United States into a socialist country?

Clearly neither Barack Hussein Obama nor his handlers have read the Arizona anti-alien invasion laws. So Barack Hussein Obama and his minions are spewing forth lies about what they would like to think the law says and more lies about why they oppose the anti-alien invasion laws.

"I was pleased to see a strong proposal for comprehensive reform presented in the Senate last week, and I was pleased it was based on a bipartisan framework," Obama said. "I want to begin work this year. And I want Democrats and Republicans to work with me."

Just like the bipartisan support of the recent Health Care Deform bill (no republicans or independents supported the bill), the bipartisan support for the expected amnesty Immigration Reform is also likely to be exclusively provided by the democrats.

Without a comprehensive federal approach, the president said, state and local authorities would continue to take "misconceived" steps at addressing the illegal immigration problem, such as the recently enacted Arizona law that allows police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency.

Likely the real reason why Barack Hussein Obama is against police asking for proof of legal U.S. residency is that he doesn't have an American birth certificate.

Actually, we already do have a comprehensive federal approach to the alien invasion. There is a federal law that makes it a crime to illegally invade this country. There is a whole federal department dedicated to deporting alien invaders if they get caught. Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of his henchmen in the Washington District of Criminals have been refusing to enforce the laws this country already has. They have tried to brainwash us into believing that putting up fences and guards would not make it more difficult for alien invaders to enter this country unlawfully.

However, "we can't start singling out people depending on who they look like or how they talk or how they dress," he said, adding he has asked for a review of the Arizona law.

This is the typical lie that the supporters of criminal rights trot out with the support of the mass media. The Arizona anti-alien invader law simply allows that anyone who would normally be stopped by law enforcement officials can be asked if they are legal residents. And since the first thing that law enforcement officials ask for is a drivers license, then anyone without one is likely driving illegally (also a crime) and therefore can be asked about their resident status.

Comprehensive immigration reform would include continuing government efforts to secure borders from illegal immigrants as well as steps to crack down on businesses employing illegal immigrants, Obama said.

Comprehensive amnesty immigration reform for alien invaders does not include any addition attempts to secure the borders. The federal government has been dragging their feet in building fences and increasing the number of border guards. That is unlikely to change. All the federal government and the other supporters of rights of criminals can talk about is how to provide amnesty for the latest batch of alien invaders.

In addition, he said, those living illegally in the United States would have to pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English, "make themselves right with the law" and then start the process of gaining legal citizenship.

Yup. Barack Hussein Obama wants amnesty for the latest batch of alien invaders, and he will stoop to whatever depths are required to bribe or brainwash the democrats to vote for it.

Yet another perfect example of the corrupt Chicago style corrupt politics in action.

Alien Invaders Demand The Same Rights As Any Legal Visitor To This Country.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/05/01/immigration.rallies/
Protests against Arizona immigration law go nationwide

Thousands of protesters in cities across the United States waved American flags as they rallied Saturday against Arizona's tough new immigration law and pushed for national immigration reform.

The alien invaders have successfully brainwashed the national news media into believing that criminals (breaking federal laws against invading this country) are deserving of amnesty.

The federal government is doing their part to support the national news media by encouraging disgust with the federal government and politicians in general, by doing nothing to resolve a problem that is much more serious than whether someone has health insurance.

The new Arizona law requires immigrants to carry their alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question people if there is reason to suspect they are in the United States illegally. Critics say it will lead to discrimination and racial profiling.

The supporters of the alien invaders (criminals according to federal law) are clearly racists because the new Arizona law does not change any existing law which makes it illegal to stop someone because the law enforcement personnel don't like their looks.

The supporters of the criminal alien invaders are clearly illiterates because all the rhetoric they are spouting to attack the new Arizona law has nothing to do with the law as actually written.

The Arizona law quite clearly states that ONLY people being stopped for some other suspicious activity can be questioned about their legal status. There are already laws in place that say it is wrong to stop someone based on their looks. The Arizona law does NOT change that.

"Does my face look illegal?" one sign read.

The face may not look illegal, but the sign certainly identifies someone who supports criminal activity. The new Arizona law is designed to allow law enforcement officials to question anyone who is acting suspicious, or encouraging people to commit crimes or is engaged in committing a crime.

Do you want illegal invaders who happen to be Muslim Terrorist to have the right to stand on street corners with a pot and a bell asking for donations to help pay for bombs to be set in densely populated cities?

A smaller group of about 200 people rallied outside the State Capitol in Phoenix, protesting the new law and asking the federal government to step in to stop it.

What the criminal invaders (and their supporters) in this country refuse to understand, is that it is already a crime to invade the United States. All the Arizona law does, is tell the local law enforcement organizations that they need to enforce the law. The new Arizona law also makes it clear that the corrupt and incompetent bunglers in Washington District of Criminals (D.C.) are refusing to enforce laws that they have previously passed. The corrupt and incompetent bunglers in Washington District of Criminals (D.C.) need to make it legal for all alien invaders to cross the border of this country any time they want to. Or. The corrupt and incompetent bunglers in Washington District of Criminals (D.C.) need to enforce the laws already on the books that make it a crime for aliens to invade the United States.

"They were trying to convey that message that it's a city and nation based on immigration. Everybody came from somewhere else," he said.

No they are not! The alien invaders (and their criminal supporters) are trying to get criminal activity legalized. It has nothing to do with immigration. It has everything to do with amnesty for criminal acts. But staging these protest rallies, the alien invaders (and their criminal supporters) are sending the message of their contempt for the laws of the United States. The alien invaders (and their criminal supporters) are sending the message that they have more rights than the legal citizens who obeyed the laws that are in place for anyone who wants to legally visit or live here.

May I See Your Papers Please?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gIrhUxh7ZTUJ__3DbPaH5YpyPFcQD9FF9DIO0
Could immigration furor create positive evolution?

No! It can't lead to positive evolution. None of the loudmouths (Barack Hussein Obama, mass media, liberals, democrats, illegal invaders, ...) are interested in a fair, unbiased, impartial solution. All they want is to strike down ALL laws on immigration and illegal entry (invasion). It seems to me that their main concern is allowing Mexico to take back the land that the whites unfairly took from them.

What good could possibly come of this bad situation? A lot, it turns out. Because suddenly the entire nation is having a huge Arizona conversation, from rallies on the streets to voices on the airwaves — and there are signs of compromise instead of confrontation.

Compromise? Yeah. Right. We are hearing about compromise on the illegal invaders issue in the same way that Barack Hussein Obama is creating and supporting bipartisan legislation. ie. Barack Hussein Obama has not, and will not stoop to creating any kind of bipartisan legislation or support for any of his socialist pet projects.

All the illegal invaders and their supporters seem to be saying the same thing. The United States, and the individual states and cities have no right to prevent the ravening hordes from coming across the border.

California agrees, as numerous cities have declared themselves sanctuary cities for the newest criminal element to invade the United States.

This policy seems to be working well for California. The average income of a California resident is dropping like a stone. Anyone with any money or job or business is fleeing the state as fast as they can.

"I'm concerned about the whole idea of carrying papers and always having to be able to prove your citizenship," said Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. "That brings up some shades of some other regimes that weren't necessarily helpful to democracy."

Exactly. The United States is not, and has not been a democracy for a long time. So it is time to stop pretending that we are a democracy. It only leads to the lunacy of claiming that we shouldn't need to provide papers when stopped by the police.

Yet that is exactly what we are already doing. Have you ever been stopped by a policeman and NOT been asked for your drivers license and registration? Have you ever applied for a loan and not been asked for a tax return or other informational form? Do you remember when you used to need to have two forms of ID to cash a check? Do you ever use your credit card and need to show a drivers license?

We already live in a totalitarian country, where we need to show our papers to all manner of people all the time.

And to put this into perspective. Do you ever travel to other countries and need to show your passport to whatever official wants to see it?

Or to put it another way.

Do you want to make it legal for Osama Bin Laden (or any other terrorist) to walk across the Mexican - American border and not be required to show some identification papers?

Arizona Says Obama Pro-Immigration Stance Is 'Misguided'.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/23/AR2010042302213.html
Obama says Arizona immigration bill 'misguided'

President Barack Obama says the government must enact immigration reform at the national level - or leave the door open to "irresponsibility by others."

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Because the federal government has refused to address the illegal alien problem in any meaningful way, the states most seriously affected by the problem are starting to act.

Anything which adds millions of uneducated poverty stricken people to the population is a socialist dream that Barack Hussein Obama and the other liberal socialist democrats approve of. If any state tries to prevent this from happening, Barack Hussein Obama must quash it as soon as possible for fear that any of his other socialist dreams for this country would soon fall afterwards.

Arizona's American Citizen Protection Bill (to punish illegal aliens) has inspired Barack Hussein Obama to use the same skills he used to subvert the American Health Care system to address the illegal alien problem. However, if Barack Hussein Obama's idea of "immigration reform" is anything like is idea of "Health Care" Deform I think I have the perfect solution.

Everyone in the United States needs to renounce their American citizenship. They need to leave the United States. The former United States citizens then need to sneak back across the United States border.

Anyone sneaking back across the United States borders will then become an illegal alien. They will now be eligible for free health care, free welfare, free education, ...

The liberal socialist democrats will have what they want. A large population of unemployed illegal aliens looking for free handouts and willing to vote for anyone who promises to increase the size of the handouts.

The federal government will have what they want. The problem will be too big for the current law enforcement department to deal with, so the police state force will need to increase in size.

The citizens will have what they want. As illegal aliens they will no longer have to pay the outrageously high income taxes. The new illegal aliens no longer need to fear law enforcement as there are now more laws on the books to protect the rights of illegal aliens than there are to protect the rights of law abiding citizens.

Problem solved.

Criminals Object To State Enforcement Of Federal Law.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i4nY72M0hFVOHUzIrqYpD67DoBxgD9F8NAG00
Ariz. gov. to act on immigration enforcement bill

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer on Friday neared a deadline to act on the nation's toughest legislation against illegal immigration.

The sweeping measure would make it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal.

What is the world coming to when a state wants to enforce a federal law that the federal government won't repeal but won't enforce?

We are not talking about rape, or robbery, or kidnapping or not buying health insurance. We are talking about a crime that in foreign countries you can get put in prison for 10 or more years and face a heavy monetary penalty. We are talking about entering this country without asking permission.

Civil rights activists have said the bill would lead to racial profiling and deter Hispanics from reporting crimes.

This is terrible. It may discourage criminals from reporting crimes. I know I want the police to protected drug smugglers who get ripped off by other drug smugglers or their customers.

Hundreds of Hispanics protested the legislation at the State Capitol complex on Thursday.

Were any of the protesters criminals who crossed the federal border illegally?

But the civil rights activists and the criminals may have a point. Maybe the illegal aliens shouldn't have to obey the law of the land. If so, then I want to see murderers and rapists stand up for their right to break the law. Maybe tax cheats shouldn't have to obey the tax laws (although tax cheats appointed by Barack Hussein Obama already have the right to disobey the law). Maybe people without health insurance shouldn't have to buy insurance?

Other provisions of the bill allow lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.

But this law goes too far. It makes it a state crime for the federal government to prevent enforcement of federal law by state agencies.

How can the average citizen (non-criminal) complain about the capricious and arbitrary nature of the law, if the state government is allowed to enforce federal laws that the federal government has chosen to turn a blind eye to "don't ask, don't tell".

Brewer's predecessor, Janet Napolitano, a Democrat who is now President Barack Obama's Homeland Security secretary, vetoed proposals similar to the bill just approved by the Legislature.

Evidently, Janet Napolitano believes it is better to criminalize otherwise law abiding United States citizens, and allow illegal aliens the right to collect welfare, health care, and any other government giveaway program that United States citizens must pay for.

Others urging Brewer to veto the bill include Catholic bishops, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, and Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, the Democratic Party's presumptive nominee for governor. Mexico's embassy also has voiced concerns about racial profiling.

It is good to know that Washington, District of Criminals (D.C.) are not the only hypocrites on this continent. Mexico, has much harsher illegal immigration laws. Illegal aliens in Mexico are felons who get a jail term before getting deported.

But the real bottom line, is that the federal government is NOT interested in protecting the citizens of the United States. The federal government is ONLY interested in getting more power. The federal government is ONLY interested in taking away the rights of legal citizens. The federal government is ONLY interested in getting more laws on the books that they don't plan on enforcing so that if they ever want to arbitrarily prosecute someone they will have the laws ready and waiting for them.

This just goes to show that there is a reason one of the three biggest lies told on a regular basis is:
I'm from the government and I am here to help.

What The United States Could Learn From North Korea.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/22/north-korea-american-trial-illegal-entry
North Korea to put US citizen on trial for illegal entry

North Korea today said it would put a US citizen on trial for entering the country illegally.

You will never see a similar headline in the United States about putting an illegal alien on trial for crossing the border.

In North Korea, they are afraid that any person entering their country illegally has the potential to kill the dictator-in-chief and / or overthrow the existing government.

In the United States, anyone entering the country illegally is considered a future democratic voter. So instead of punishment, the government is falling all over itself to provide free services that are not available in the country the criminals came from. So there is no federal effort to prevent anyone from illegally crossing the United States borders. And if anyone who does cross the borders illegally, they are not punished. At worst, they are sent home, to try to cross the borders again.

I guess the federal government wants to make it easier for the Muslim terrorists to smuggle themselves and their weapons across the border so their next attack on Americans can take place on American soil.

Government Plan For Illegal Immigrants. Don't Change Anything. But Spend More Money For Hardware That Won't Work.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-immigration12-2010mar12,0,5784564.story
Senators give Obama a bipartisan plan on immigration

Although details of their blueprint were not released, Graham said the elements included tougher border security, a program to admit temporary immigrant workers and a biometric Social Security card that would prevent people here illegally from getting jobs.

I wonder what the tougher border security can be?

The government has already said that they don't want fences. The government has already said that they don't want more guards. So what other security measures are left?

I wonder what program the government will come up with that could be less effective than the current program to bring in illegal alien workers?

The current free market system seems to be able to bring in more than enough illegal aliens as temporary workers. But I guess there is a law against any useless bill not having a lot of useless provisions. And any useless bill must create a useless agency with an unlimited lifespan and an unlimited budget for doing something that is already being done.

I wonder what a biometric Social Security card can do that the current non-biometric social security cards aren't doing? Other than forcing the criminals who provide fake social security cards to spend more money on creating more expensive fake social security cards.

The government has already said that illegal aliens play an important part in the economy of the United States. The government database that employers are supposed to use to verify status of employees is wrong more than 50% of the time. So how is wasting a lot more money on a much more expensive social security card supposed to change that?

Something the government hasn't thought of?

It sounds nice that the government wants to prevent illegal aliens from getting jobs. But at least if illegal aliens have jobs, they are actually earning money, from which taxes are withheld. If illegal aliens are prevented from getting jobs, all they can do is collect their welfare checks and send their children to public schools. As long as the government isn't interested in deporting illegal immigrants, then why not let them get jobs and pay taxes out of their own money?