I Want A Degree In High Heel Walking!

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/1067001/college-course-teaches-teens-to-walk-in-heels
College course teaches girls to walk in heel

A government-funded course that teaches teenage girls how to walk in high heels has raised eyebrows in London.

Why has a course for walking in high heels at a local college raised any eyebrows? It is not as if a college education currently has any value.

Over the years the goal of education has changed.

Before government took over, education was provided by and for individuals who wanted to better themselves, and make an impact on the world. After the government took over education, it was to create a class of incompetent, hopeless and corrupt slaves to labor under their slave masters orders, or be sent to the gulags for reeducation.

It was educated people who believed in freedom who created the United States in order to have a better life for themselves and their children. Unfortunately for the government, those are the kind of people that no government that wants to stay in power for any length of time can have as slaves citizens. If you believe that you can make a better life for yourself and your children, you are less likely to accept the abuses that government dishes out. You are more likely to stand up for your rights and fight for them. If the government can convert citizens into slaves, then the government can continue until it collapses from the greed and corrupt that this kind of system promotes. In case you have forgotten your American history (or are a college graduate, and therefore never learned), America was formed by people fleeing a repressive government.

I do have a few more questions and comments for you before ending this rant.

In California (and probably elsewhere), there are many students that can NOT read or write in ANY language!

How could a government that is facing bankruptcy, and the inability to supply welfare for the jobless and the alien invaders, come up with funding for a college class to teach walking in high heels?

How could any college, teachers or staff, allow their premises be used for teaching walking in high heels?

Why aren't the faculty and students rioting and looting and burning down that college and the town it is located in? In California, the students riot and loot and burn down local businesses for the "rights" of alien invaders to invade the United States and for the "rights" of Muslim terrorists to kill citizens in the United States and abroad.

Therefore, I believe that the government controlled education system is finally approaching the degree of success that it has been aiming for all along. Very soon, the only value a college degree will have is to wipe yourself after going to the bathroom.

Obama Celebrates Physicians Unwillingness To Care For Patients.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/health/policy/13address.html
Obama Presses Congress to Avert Medicare Pay Cuts

“I’m absolutely willing to take the difficult steps necessary to lower the cost of Medicare and put our budget on a more fiscally sustainable path,” he (Barack Hussein Obama) said. “But I’m not willing to do that by punishing hard-working physicians or the millions of Americans who count on Medicare.”

Oh really? Barack Hussein Obama doesn't want to punish physicians or Americans? Then why did Barack Hussein Obama work so hard to get the deeply flawed Health Care Deform bill passed? Why does the "fair" Health Care Deform bill punish both doctors and patients? Why does the Health Care Deform bill have spiraling out of control costs? Why didn't Barack Hussein Obama refuse to sign the bill, and ask for one that does NOT include all the usual pork barrel bills? Why didn't Barack Hussein Obama do any of the things he claimed he would do when campaigning for office?

Day 53: Oil Well Capped. Leak Cleaned Up.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/us/13latest.html
Day 53: The Latest on the Oil Spill

Day 53: Oil Well Capped. Leak Cleaned Up.

What's wrong? Why don't you believe me? You believed Barack Hussein Obama when he fraudulently claimed that the stimulus (welfare for the wealthy) would fix the economy. With millions unemployed and millions facing homelessness, you still believed Barack Hussein Obama when he said that he really did fix the economy. You believed Barack Hussein Obama when he claimed that the Health Care Deform bill would fix the problems with the health care industry AND balance the budget at the same time. You believed Barack Hussein Obama when he claimed he wasn't bowing down to third world dictators and other foreign dignitaries. You believed Barack Hussein Obama was being impartial every time he defended Muslim terrorists that killed Americans. You believe Barack Hussein Obama every time he lies (which is every time he opens his mouth).

So why won't you believe me when I claim that the underwater oil well is capped and that the ocean has been cleaned up? I guess I need to be elected liar-in-chief of the United States before people will believe a big liar and his big lies.

What Can $30 Billion Do That $800 Billion Couldn't Do?

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN119179020100611
Obama renews call on Congress for $30 bln job bill

After the worst recession in decades, many small businesses report trouble getting credit. Obama's proposal would establish a $30 billion fund to boost lending to small businesses looking to hire and expand operations by providing additional capital to community banks.

Actually, to be honest, something that Barack Hussein Obama and his czars and commissars will never be, this is the worst depression the United States has ever had. Ever! This is the great depression! This is not a recession. This is not a minor correction. You can NOT ignore the problem and go on with business as usual. Aside from the fact that there are very few businesses left to actually continue in business.

If the almost $800 billion stimulus (welfare for the wealthy) given away to political cronies last year didn't help the economy, how can $30 billion more make any difference.

Oh wait, the $800 billion stimulus (welfare for the wealthy) was political payback for contributing to Barack Hussein Obama's political campaign. So the bill that "you must vote for to find out what is in it", the bill that is "too important for you to have time to read and understand" had the opposite effect of what was claimed. However, the bill had the exact result that was intended. Which is why there are now millions of Americans who have lost jobs. That is why those lost no longer exist and will NEVER come back. Which is why millions of Americans are now facing losing their homes. This is what Barack Hussein Obama calls saving the economy!

If the $800 billion stimulus (welfare for the wealthy) had been divided evenly among all the men, women and children (and illegal aliens that the left wing democrats care so much for), everybody in this country would have gotten a check for more than $100,000 each. If every person in this country started spending money like drunken sailors (or sober congressmen and senators), the current economy would look very different.

So you can rest assured that when the liar-in-chief tells you something, that it is a lie, and likely will have the opposite effect of what it is claimed it will do.

Is Alvin Green Too Moral To Become Senator?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/us/politics/12greene.html
Who’s Alvin Greene? State Asks After Vote

The Associated Press reported that Mr. Greene was arrested in November and is facing a felony obscenity charge; he is accused of showing pornography to a University of South Carolina student. He had been discharged “involuntarily” from the Army and showed no signs of having waged an actual campaign in recent months — no advertising, no staff, no money.

Alvin Green looks like the typical socialist liberal democratic candidate. And like all socialist liberal democratic candidates, his major problem is in getting elected before getting caught. Unlike the Barack Hussein Obama campaign, where the press whitewashed the racist American hating incompetent candidate with no job skills and no understanding of what America is, the press somehow accidentally discovered some of Alvin Green's problems, and managed to not cover them up as usual. Which places the democratic party in the awkward position of trying to explain why they have to pretend they don't know who this guy is and how he managed to run for office on the socialist liberal democratic platform. But as long as the press believes that their job as socialist liberal democrats is to cover up any and all problems with the socialist liberal democratic candidate, this will be a continuing problem.

Economic Collapse Is Good For The Economy.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704113504575264513748386610.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read
Tax Hikes and the 2011 Economic Collapse

It shouldn't surprise anyone that the nine states without an income tax are growing far faster and attracting more people than are the nine states with the highest income tax rates. People and businesses change the location of income based on incentives.

Are you sure about that?

That can't be right?

Government science (create theory, throw out facts that are contrary to theory) proves that higher taxes and more regulation stimulates the economy.

It seems to surprise politicians and economists. Why else are politicians and economists constantly raising taxes and creating more regulations in an effort to stimulate business. If lowering taxes, and reducing regulations would stimulate earnings, and thus increase employment and taxes, don't you think that politicians and economists would recommend that in times of massive depression like we are currently experiencing?

Wait, I forgot. What we are experiencing is an economic recovery. Don't all economic recoveries feature millions of unemployed? Don't all economic recoveries feature millions of homeless? Don't all economic recoveries feature massive government debt?

Obama Could Be Best President Ever, If He Would Only Go Back To Accepting Bribes In Chicago Instead Of In The White House.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703703704575276931429180508.html
Pelosi's Loss Could Be Obama's Gain

In Washington these days, President Obama is rumored to be hoping Republicans capture the House of Representatives in the midterm election in November. There's no evidence for this speculation, so far as I know, but it's hardly far-fetched. If Mr. Obama wants to avert a fiscal crisis and win re-election in 2012, he needs House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to be removed from her powerful post. A GOP takeover may be the only way.

It's too late to avert a fiscal crisis. Between the stimulus (welfare for the wealthy) and the Health Care Deform monstrosity, the United States has been dealt a one two punch in the economy that it may never recover from.

This opinion piece seems to think it is worth while to reelect Barack Hussein Obama as long as you don't allow Barack Hussein Obama to actually do anything. With the way things are currently going, the best thing the United States can do is reverse everything that Barack Hussein Obama did. The second best thing the United States can do, is nothing. Unfortunately, Barack Hussein Obama was able to pass all kinds of legislation that has fatally damaged the ability of the United States to provide freedom and a safe environment to it's legal citizens. So at this point, even doing nothing, is way too problematic for the United States because of the bills passed when Barack Hussein Obama was actively working to destroy the United States.

Although I am not sure why anyone with Barack Hussein Obama's agenda, deserves reelection. And I am even less sure why it is important to reelect someone who's goals are as un-American as Barack Hussein Obama's are.

The Best Politicians Money Can Buy.

http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=82942&catid=2
Are Meg Whitman and Steve Poizner trying to buy the election?

Of course they are trying to buy the election. In the grand tradition of corrupt politics, all politicians are used to buying their political office. Just ask former governor Rod Blagojevich about buying and selling political offices.

"Voters are electing people to represent themselves," he (Dave Levinthal with the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington D.C.) said. "Therefore, these candidates, no matter how much money they have, no matter how many movies they've made, still report to the people of California."

What a great sound bite. Spoken like a true politician. With not a word of truth in the whole statement.

A more honest statement would read that "fat cat politicians, with their million dollar slush funds, with their full pensions after one term in office, in their chauffeur driven cars report to the people of California, but they answer to the special interest groups that fund their campaigns". Is it possible that Meg Whitman or Steve Poizner will answer to the people? Sure it is. It is also possible that the sun won't rise in the east and that Barack Hussein Obama will finally tell the truth. It is just not very likely.

Even if you are willing to suspend your ability to think, and accept that Meg Whitman or Steve Poizner if elected will do what is best for California, you are forgetting one not so minor problem. All the rest of the politicians in Sacramento that are unwilling to balance the budget. Their time is better spent prohibiting teenage girls from getting nipple rings, deciding the price and kind of grocery bags available to shoppers (paper or plastic) or declaring war on Arizona.

Lest you think I am coming down too hard on California politicians, let me remind you of the Health Care Deform Bill recently passed in Washington District of Criminals (D.C.). When congress first tried to pass the bill, they had to bribe some of the politicians to vote for it. When the politicians realized that the senate would NOT pass the congressional bill, congress tried to pass the bill by pretending it had already passed and they were simply amending the bill. When that didn't work, and congress finally decided to accept the senat version of the Health Care Deform bill, the congressmen were assured that as a matter of public policy they could find out what the bill does by voting for the bill. Does this seem like politicians who are answering to their constituents? If so, why were so many democrats rushing to announce their retirement after the bill passed?

Federal Government Reduces Taxes By Millions And Never Notices.

http://azstarnet.com/news/national/article_22ab01cd-2f71-54c3-9c1b-6daa0a51ed87.html
Children's health program loses millions due to tobacco-tax loophole

A tobacco tax loophole in President Obama's children's health-insurance program cost the government more than $250 million in its first year, public health officials say.

Barack Hussein Obama must be proud of himself. In an effort to balance the budget, he has managed to decrease revenue and increase spending. Just like most of his other plans to balance the budget.

Or to explain this in a different way, this is like the federal government passing a "Global Warming" reduction bill that includes making it a crime to breathe, and then spending years working on an environmental impact report to determine the consequences of repealing the part of the law that criminalizes breathing.

As this article goes on to explain, the difference between rolling tobacco and pipe tobacco is about $21.00 per pound in taxes. Since business is never as stupid or corrupt as politicians, rolling tobacco is being relabeled as pipe tobacco. The federal government which so carefully writes these bills, and monitors their effect, never noticed the annual loss of $250 million of tax revenue. The state of Oregon, not being quite as incompetent and corrupt as the federal government did notice that the new federal law caused a major decrease in tax revenue.

Fortunately for the tobacco industry, federal politicians who are always willing to rush to pass poorly written laws, will never rush to fix poorly written laws.

California Lawmaker Paid To Skip Work.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-bass-20100605,0,4785236,print.story
California lawmaker skips Capitol meetings but collects tax-free per diem payments

Since Karen Bass announced her bid for Congress in February, the former speaker of the state Assembly has been missing from the chamber she once led more than she has been there. Bass nonetheless continued to collect the tax-free per diem payments that lawmakers are given to cover expenses associated with attending legislative sessions.

What is wrong with this picture?

Nothing. Politicians as a general rule never do any useful work when in office. So not showing up for work and getting paid anyway is hardly out of line for a politician. And considering how corrupt and incompetent most politicians are, it is a good thing that they rarely show up for work, or the state of California would have gone bankrupt much sooner than it will.

On March 3, Bass stood on the steps of City Hall with Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to announce his endorsement. Two weeks earlier, she was joined by a trio of City Council members — Eric Garcetti, Paul Krekorian and Tom LaBonge — to announce their backing.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is probably the perfect politician to endorse state Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, as Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has almost a perfect record of avoiding work. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is famous worldwide for being almost as unethical, corrupt, incompetent as any Mexican National or Chicago politician. So if Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is endorsing state Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, then I suspect we all know what kind of job she has been doing and will be doing if reelected.

California Legislators Winning The Race To The Bottom National Contest.

http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/content/view/print/305813
California advances grocery store plastic bag ban

The California Assembly on Wednesday approved a bill that would ban stores from providing plastic bags, and require them to charge for paper ones. Similar bans are in place in China and Bangladesh.

California legislators are determined to win Obama's "Race To The Bottom".

Their plan to win is showing great promise. First off, California legislators are refusing to balance the budget, which is currently short by about $20 billion short. By not balancing the budget, the California legislators are insuring that government employees will go on strike to collect their wages. This will also help the California economy by forcing business that supply the state with goods and services to go bankrupt when they can't pay their bills because California won't pay it's bills.

California legislators plans to balance the budget are equally farsighted. They are planning on selling off public buildings as well as parks and recreational facilities to real estate developers. I am eagerly looking forward to the time when the all government offices are shut down and government employees evicted when the State of California can't make the rent payments.

Alternative plans to win the "Race To The Bottom" include innovative ways to deal with the overcrowding in prisons. By increasing arrests for misdemeanors, the overcrowding problem is made worse. The solution that California legislators have come up with is to provide early release for violent felons and not provide parole services for the early releases. Which is not as bad as you would think. After all, rapist kidnappers can easily harbor kidnap victims for 20 or more years while under supervision and not get noticed.

One plan that the California legislators are contemplating, is doubling or tripling the tax rates on any businesses that haven't yet failed and on legal citizens that haven't yet declared bankruptcy. Adding more people to the welfare and unemployment rolls is always good for a federal bailout. If increasing the taxes is not enough, making California a magnet state for unemployed and alien invaders is destined to overwhelm the welfare and unemployment rolls, thus forcing the federal government to give California an even larger bailout.

An of course the one plan that all legislators always approve of. Giving themselves raises.

As you can see, the California legislators have the not balancing the budget problem well in hand. So it makes sense that the California legislators move on to other important issues. Like ignoring the failing economy. But how will the California legislators deflect attention from their unwillingness to balance the budget and save the economy?

Easy. The California legislators will work on legislation that is near and dear to the "green party" and other socialist groups. Like whether grocery stores should use paper or plastic bags. Obviously this is a much more important issue than balancing the budget, saving the economy, or letting violent felons out of prison early.

Aren't you glad that California politicians are hard at work doing whatever it is that politicians do?

The Los Angeles Unified School District To Teach That All Whites Are Racists.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/06/02/la-school-district-teaches-az-law-is-un-american/print
Los Angeles Students to Be Taught That Arizona Immigration Law Is Un-American

The Los Angeles Unified School District school board wants all public school students in the city to be taught that Arizona's new immigration law is un-American.

This makes sense to me.

The goal of the Los Angeles School system is to matriculate a sub-literate who is incapable of thinking. This is the kind of individual we need to fill our prisons and welfare offices. So these are the kinds of things that need to be taught in our schools.

The schools are already teaching "Intelligent Design". The schools are already teaching "Global Warming". What harm can there be in requiring schools to spend time teaching even more leftist propaganda disguised as truth. Maybe the schools can then teach that looting and rioting is an appropriate form of political protest. Heck, it is probably racist to require the Mexican Nationals getting their free education in the United States to learn to speak English. After all, we know that the real reason for the anger at the Arizona Alien Invader law is because it will delay giving back southwestern United States to Mexico.

Just think, if every left wing nut job is not able to inject his favorite insanity into the educational system, how can the democratic minority ever hope to win an election again?

Gavin Newsom Wants To Lead California Where No Law Abiding Citizen Wants To Go.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/pop_print.shtml?content_type=article&content_type_id=5431922
Gavin Newsom Running for California Lieutenant Governor

If he can get elected lieutenant governor and serve a full term or more, voters may get a chance to see Gavin Newsom and tell if he can serve responsibly and fairly in a statewide office. Then Newsom might have a chance at running for the governor position.

Why do we need to wait? We already know that Gavin Newsom is not going to act responsibly as lieutenant governor of California.

Gavin Newsom didn't act responsibly as the mayor of San Francisco. Gavin Newsom declared San Franciso is a sanctuary city for alien invaders. Gavin Newsom ran an advertising campaign so that San Francisco would be a magnet for the alien invaders. How is that acting responsibly? How did that benefit the legal taxpaying citizens of San Francisco? I guess the legal taxpaying citizens could be assured that when they were being murdered by an illegal alien gang banger who was just released from prison rather than being deported that the alien gang banger was being treated as well as any victorious invading army would be treated by the losing side.

But then again, this is California. What ain't fruits and nuts is flakes. And Gavin Newsom is acting as responsibly as any left wing liberal socialist is capable of acting when working for the destruction of the United States. Maybe Gavin Newsom can petition Mexico to make California a tributary state for Mexico, so that all the legal citizens can get evicted to make space for the now legal Mexican citizens who only left their country because of the incompetent corrupt pandering politicians, much like Gavin Newsom.

This is truly what we need for the State of California to make it a great part of Mexico.

Obama Guarantees Success Of Government Motors New Electric Car.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/driveon/post/2010/05/chevrolet-volt-the-high-tech-car-that-will-save-michigan/1
Chevrolet Volt: The high-tech car that will save Michigan?

Now it's expected to save the state of Michigan, says the Associated Press. "The Volt is crucial. So much depends on this car. It cannot fail," the story states.

If so much depends on the success of this car, then Michigan has nothing to worry about.

All these years when the auto unions were contributing millions of dollars to the democratic party are finally paying off. First Bush and then Obama presided over the major bail out of General Motors, and then finally the take over of Government Motors. So at this point Michigan and Detroit have nothing to worry about. Government Motors has bribed enough politicians so that is too big to fail. So even if this new car is so shoddy that no one will buy it, the federal government has promised to buy the car. In vast quantities. Even if the car doesn't work. Which is not as bad as it seems, as very few government employees do any work for the benefit and general welfare of the people of the United States. So having more employees or equipment on the government books that doesn't work is not unusual.

So rest assured, the Volt will be a smashing success. Even if the democrats have to bury their support for Government Motors in another Health Care Deform bill.

Republican Candidates Prove That Democrats Don't Have Monopoly On Dishonest Mudslinging.

http://www.mercurynews.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article.jsp?articleId=15149190&siteId=568
GOP candidates polluting airwaves

Wave after wave of high octane, negative political advertisements have crowded out any hope of thoughtful discourse in the Republican gubernatorial primary, the outgrowth of an unprecedented $100 million poured into a tightly contested campaign by two wealthy masters of the Silicon Valley universe: Meg Whitman, billionaire ex-chief executive of eBay, and multimillionaire Steve Poizner, the state's insurance commissioner.

Let me get this straight.

The courts have already ruled that it is OK for politicians to lie during their political campaigns. The courts have already ruled that no politician can be forced to actually do any of the things they promised they would do if they get elected.

The courts have already ruled that it is illegal to sell your vote.

So your vote is worthless, and you can't believe anything that a politician says.

So why are we wasting out time paying attention to liars, who even if they were telling the truth have no duty or responsibility to the voters?

Obama Seeks Ways To Avoid Spending Cuts From Bills.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64N29F20100524?type=politicsNews
Obama seeks way to trim costs from spending bills

President Barack Obama is sending a proposal to Congress on Monday that would make it quicker and easier to trim "wasteful" costs from congressional spending bills, an administration official said.

Ever time Barack Hussein Obama opens his mouth, he spews forth lies. The same is true for czars and commissars. Observe the nonsense that this anonymous henchmen or minion used to mischaracterize this bill.

The "Reduce Unnecessary Spending Act of 2010" would enable the president to submit a package of cuts or "rescissions" to Congress after lawmakers pass one of the annual spending or appropriations bills that fund federal programs every year.

Let's translate this into plain English from the liespeak that all politicians and government employees use. This only applies to the annual federal budget. This means that it doesn't apply to any "earmarks" or "pork" that gets passed the other 364 days that the legislature passes non-budgetary bills.

Under the terms of the proposal, Congress would have to look at the president's slate of suggested cuts as a package and, without making any amendments, give them an up-or-down vote within a specific period of time.

As with all Barack Hussein Obama recent legislation, this bill allows Barack Hussein Obama to write a multi-thousand page bill that mentions thousands or millions of spending cuts. While the congress and the senate may pass multi-thousand page spending bills in order to sneak in their pet "earmarks" or "pork", I do NOT believe that the congress and the senate will allow every bodies pet "earmarks" or "pork" to be removed this easily.

Another thing to keep in mind. Most "earmarks" or "pork" bills are for small amounts of money, millions at most. Do you remember that the recent Health Care Deform bill that was passed will increase federal spending by trillions. So to put this in perspective. If the government manages to save a few million while spending trillions more, is like when you lose your house and job, and try to save a few pennies while owing thousands. A meaningless gesture. Simply grandstanding.

Reporters Surprised At Hatred Directed Towards All Politicians.

http://www.californiabeat.org/2010/05/20/whitman-plummets-in-poll-as-public-pummels-politicians-in-sacramento
Whitman plummets in poll as public pummels politicians in Sacramento

Disapproval of Sacramento politicians at record highs

The 2010 election comes in a year in which voter disapproval of state politicians is higher than ever. 23 percent of adults surveyed in the poll — a record low — approve of Schwarzenegger’s performance as governor, while 65 percent — a record high — disapprove.

And while the state legislature’s approval ratings recovered slightly from a record low in March, they’re nothing to gloat about either — only 16 percent of adults approve of the legislature’s performance, while 72 percent disapprove. Likely voters are even more likely to disapprove than the population at large, with 80 percent disapproving of the legislature’s performance.

Voters’ expectations for cooperation between the governor and legislature to solve problems such as the state’s continuing budget crisis are also at all-time lows — only 19 percent of adults expect the governor and legislature to “work together and accomplish a lot this year,” as opposed to 73 percent who expect otherwise.

Who would have ever thought that business as usual (for politicians this means bribery, corruption, infighting, raising taxes, reprehensible legislation that harms the citizens, ...) would cause citizens to fear and hate all politicians. Obviously not politicians, or they might change their ways. But law abiding citizens capable of learning and change are NOT the kind of people who run for political office or seek to work for the government.

So what does the state of California have to look forward to?

As a sanctuary state for indigents and criminals, we can look forward to more indigents and criminals moving to California. As the indigents and criminals move in, the employers and employees will move out of the state. As the indigents and criminals move in, we can look forward to higher welfare and other benefit payments for non-workers.

As California continues spending more than it can loot and pillage from the remaining employers and employees, we can look forward to bankruptcy, and discontinuation of services that are critical to survival of our society. As California continues spending more than it can loot and pillage from the remaining employers and employees, we can look forward to employers and employees moving out of state. As the state of California increases taxes to make up for the lower collections, even more employers and employees will move out of state.

We already are seeing that one of the ways the politicians have figured out to save money is to release violent felons early. This again encourages criminals to move into California, and law abiding citizens to flee the state.

Another way the hypocritical politicians are looking at saving money is starting an economic war with states (Arizona, maybe others in the future) that prefer to go down fighting rather than looking for one last spending splurge. Please note that the Los Angeles City Council has NOT decided to stop the wasteful junkets to other cities around the country to hold meetings, they are only moving their wasteful junkets to other vacation cities around the country.

Net savings or benefits to the City of Los Angeles for their reprehensible actions? Nothing.

Downside? The contempt from 70% of the legal population of the United States, and possible boycotts of California from the 70% of the population and other states contemplating ways to save their states from the onslaught of alien invaders.

Yup. Career politicians are doing a job. Unfortunately, it is NOT the job the politicians lied to get and it is NOT the job that voters thought the politicians would do once elected.

Republicans Attempt To Prove That Democrats Don't Have A Monopoly On Supporting Corrupt Incompetent Politicians.

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/05/man_with_second_family_given_s.html
Congressman With Second Family Given Second Chance

Vito Fossella, the family-values Republican congressman whose 2008 DUI arrest in Virginia led to the discovery of a mistress and love child, has been nominated for his old seat by the GOP executive committee by a resounding 23–4 vote. "It is my firm belief that he [Fossella] is the strongest candidate we can field," party chairman John Frisci says, hilariously.

After the election of the corrupt, amoral and incompetent Barack Hussein Obama, both political parties realized that as part of the elite ruling class, they could get away with anything. Both political parties realized that the only qualifications necessary for a politician to get elected is the ability to lie convincingly and to accept bribes covertly.

Since honesty, integrity and ability are a drawback for a politician, the republican party in Staten Island decided that a drunken adulterer is the best they can come up with to run for election for the congressional office for their district.

Neither the democrats or the republicans are capable of understanding that this is the kind of action that caused the tea party movement. Neither the democrats or the republicans are capable of understanding that in their naked grab for power, the public doesn't see much difference between either existing political parties. Neither the democrats or the republicans are capable of understanding that support for dishonest corrupt and incompetent politicians is NOT the way to win the support of the people and unify the country.

100% Of Politicians Refuse To Act Responsibly Or Listen To The Voice Of The People.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0520-pot-poll-20100520,0,459933,print.story
49% of California voters back legalizing pot, poll finds

The poll, which surveyed 1,168 likely voters, found that 49% think marijuana use should be made legal, 48% do not and 3% do not know, suggesting that the proponents of the legalization measure will have to wage an expensive and persuasive campaign.

As Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the democrats and democrat wannabes have shown, it doesn't matter how many people in the United States are for or against any issue, the politicians will always act contrary to the will and the best interests of the people.

"All the polls continue to show that voters remain interested in replacing a failed policy with a more honest, commonsense solution," said Dan Newman, a campaign spokesman.

And all the politicians have continued to show their contempt for the public by promoting and passing dishonest and nonsensical solutions to real and imagined problems.

The original marijuana laws were created based on the same kind of junk science that is in use today by the "Global Warming" junk scientists. By junk science, I mean outright deception and fraud. Today, any reputable (honest) scientist who has studied marijuana knows that occasional marijuana use is less harmful to the individual and society than occasional use of alcohol or tobacco (both of which are legal).

Back in the 1930s when the racist media and the racist politicians passed their insane anti-marijuana laws, very few people smoked marijuana. And of the few that did smoke marijuana, most were minorities. After passage of the anti-marijuana laws, a whole new law enforcement agency, complete with weapons and contempt for the citizens started operation.

Before the anti-marijuana laws, the United States had the smallest number of criminals, the smallest number of prisons and the smallest number of armed thugs watching their citizens of any country on the planet. After the passage and enforcement of the anti-marijuana laws, the United States boasts the largest number of criminals, the largest number of prisons, and the largest number of armed thugs who are above the law and able to destroy citizens lives as well as create contempt for the corrupt government that enforces an irrational law. In fact, with the current budget problems, the government has has chosen to release violent criminals rather than release non-violent marijuana smokers.

Before the anti-marijuana laws, marijuana was grown by small numbers of individual growers or by the individuals who smoked. After passage of the anti-marijuana laws, entire countries (Mexico, Columbia, ...) have devoted their whole economy to growing marijuana. In fact, if you look at the Forbes 500 wealthiest men, you will now find drug lords on that list.

So you don't need to be worried that the government will start taking a rational approach to the drug problem (or any other problem). You can rest assured that the government will continue to create any crisis that it can in their eternal quest to grab more power and to increase the size of government and to oppress the people that they claim to represent.

Arizona Leads The Way To Boycott California And Other States That Provide Sanctuary For Alien Invaders.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/17/arizona-boycott-battle-immigration-law-opponents/
Arizona in Boycott Battle With Immigration Law Opponents

Supporters of Arizona's controversial immigration law are trying to turn the tables on those calling for boycotts of their state, threatening to target opponents of the law with boycotts of their own.

Fortunately for the State of California, there is no one employed by the government that actually cares about the economy or the citizens.

There are very few things that the State of California (and the various cities) care about.

The government lackeys ONLY care about increasing the size of their salaries and retirement benefits. Even though California has been harder hit by the "great depression" than most other states, most government workers have demanded and continue to receive larger than average salaries and benefits rather than adjust to the fact that they are running out of taxpaying citizens to fund their lavish lifestyles. Most government workers continue to get raises and benefits increases most citizen lose their jobs.

The government lackeys ONLY care about providing increasing care and benefits for alien invaders. It is against federal law to harbor fugitives from federal crimes, but the state, along with most cities have announced that they will be safe havens for any criminal that chooses to invade this country and demand the rights that are denied to the average citizen.

The government lackeys ONLY care about breaking federal and state laws. The State of California has on the books a law that says ALL law enforcement officials will assist the federal government in capturing and holding alien invaders. Some of the cites have announced that they are sanctuary cities for the criminal invaders. Some of the cities have passed laws making it a crime to assist the federal government to detain criminal invaders.

The government lackeys ONLY care about destroying the economy of California. The government lackeys claim it is good for the environment. But how can causing businesses to flee the state be good for the environment or the economy? How can causing businesses that can't afford to flee the state to fire employees be good for the environment or the economy? How can all these moves to reduce the tax base of the state at the same time the cities and state are actively encouraging criminal invaders without jobs to relocate to California be good for the environment or the economy? How can starting an economic war against Arizona be good for the environment or the economy?