Use A Camera, Go To Prison

http://gizmodo.com/5553765/are-cameras-the-new-guns
Are Cameras the New Guns?

In response to a flood of Facebook and YouTube videos that depict police abuse, a new trend in law enforcement is gaining popularity. In at least three states, it is now illegal to record any on-duty police officer.

Thank god for this judicial ruling. This clears up so many misunderstandings. Previously I had thought that law enforcement agencies were supposed to prevent crime. Or if they can't prevent crime, at least capture the criminals who commit crimes.

Now I know better.

Criminals switch sides and become law enforcement officials so that they can commit crimes without worry of capture or punishment. It has become a more serious crime for law abiding citizens to record law enforcement personnel committing crimes than it is for law enforcement personnel to commit crimes. Of course, it is still a crime if a law abiding citizen did what a law enforcement official did. After all, we can't have lawlessness be the law of the land.

Let me review the situation: The courts have previously ruled that it is against the law to protect yourself from unlicensed and unregulated criminals. The courts are now ruling that documenting licensed and regulated criminals (police) is a crime.

My dream of living in a communist police state has come true. And I didn't even have to flee the country to achieve it!

California Assembly Moves To Protect Criminal's Rights.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/california/ci_15206327
California Assembly advances bill to ban carrying unloaded guns

Citing safety concerns, the Assembly passed a bill Tuesday that would make it illegal to openly carry a gun in public, even if it is unloaded.

Yup.

How can a rapist, a mugger, a bank robber, or a murderer ever be sure of their safety, if the average citizen is allowed to carry weapons? Allowing innocent victims to carry weapons and protect themselves from criminals makes the streets of California an unsafe working environment for your average criminal. And considering that in a budget saving move by legislators to release violent felons early and without oversight, allowing innocent victims to carry weapons, even unloaded weapons, sends the wrong message. How can California ever become the sanctuary state for criminals it hopes to be if it allows innocent victims to protect themselves?

Maybe it is time for the criminals to start their own union. That way, the criminals will have a dedicated organization standing up for their rights. While politicians normally tend to protect criminals rights, they are not as consistent about it as they should be. If the criminals can reward the legislators every time the legislators take a stand that protects the criminals rights over the rights of innocent victims, then we would have a more uniform standard of protecting criminals and harassing innocent victims and potential victims. In fact, a criminals union would be the one union that all politicians could join without compromising their morals. I am sure that all the violent criminals would be willing to allow all the non-violent criminals (politicians) to join. Or maybe all politicians would be honorary members because of their pro crime and anti victim and anti legal citizen activities.

Maybe even a new motto.

Commit a crime, become a politician.

Obama Wants Independent Probe To Condemn Israel For Self Defense.

http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=177216
Obama wants credible flotilla probe

US President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he supports an 'independent' probe that would examine the events leading to Israel's Monday raid on the Gaza-bound protest flotilla, Army Radio reported.

Barack Hussein Obama has stated that he is willing to accept the results of an independent bipartisan probe as long as it condemns Israel and exonerates the terrorists smuggling in weapons under the guise of peace activists.

Barack Hussein Obama wants the same kind of bipartisan, independent probe that cleared the S.E.C. of incompetence and negligence for spending all their time surfing for porn rather than regulating Wall Street businesses that collapsed. The same kind of bipartisan, independent probe that cleared Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae of incompetence and negligence for allowing the banking and home mortgage industry to collapse. The same kind of bipartisan, independent probe that cleared the federal regulators who refused to oversee or investigate Bernie Madoff and allowed one of the worst Wall Street frauds in history to occur despite multiple whistle blowers. The same kind of bipartisan, independent probe that cleared the Fort Hood Muslim Terrorist of being a Muslim Terrorist and cleared ALL his superiors who refused to do anything to stop the shooter, despite knowing of the shooters extreme hate for America and all things American. The same kind of bipartisan, independent probe that will clear the federal regulators who oversee offshore oil drilling and allowed a massive oil leak which has upset the entire world.

Just as Israel has no right to exist, Israeli troops inspecting the flotilla had no right to defend themselves when attacked by the peace activists.

As a peace activist, you must be willing to kill or to die for your beliefs. As a peace activist, you must be willing to support any and all terrorist organizations that kill women, children and unarmed men. As a peace activist, you must be ready to misinform the media about any activity you participate in. So when you understand the peace activist mentality, you now understand why they must kill Jews and lie to the media about who they are and what they are doing.

Insult A Judge, Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/05/24/jailed.lawyer.richard.fine/?hpt=C1
Ex-lawyer jailed 14 months, but not charged with a crime

Once a dapper Beverly Hills attorney known for his bow tie, Richard Fine has been held in solitary confinement at Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail for 14 months, even though he's never been charged with a crime.

The State of California and all their lackeys, minions, henchmen, ... have found the perfect way to subvert the constitution of the United States and intimidate anyone they want to.

Contempt of court. You can be thrown in jail for an indefinite period of time. No need to file any charges. No trial. No jury. No freedom.

Aren't you glad you live in the United States where you have the freedom to rot in prison for an indefinite period of time without being accused, charged or convicted of a crime?

When Is A Hit And Run Accident Not A Crime? When It Is Committed By A Cop!

http://www.pjstar.com/news/x841517670/Hit-and-run-officer-may-faces-more-charges
Hit-and-run officer may face more charges

(State's Attorney Kevin) Lyons recently spoke with the park district's police chief, Sylvester Bush, and said Reed's punishment was "insignificant enough to prompt a greater interest by me in considering additional charges. To avoid this, we have encouraged the chief to revisit his 'discipline,' if any, so far imposed."

What is wrong with hitting a vehicle with your vehicle (hit and run accident)? What is wrong with fleeing the scene (hit and run accident)? What is wrong with with lying to authorities about it afterwards? Evidently, if you work for Peoria Park District there is nothing wrong with this.

What is surprising about this case is NOT that local authorities refused to punish a government employee for committing a criminal act that non-government employees are not allowed to get away with. What is surprising about this case is that the state finds this such an appalling miscarriage of justice that it is stepping in to try to get some justice for the people of Illinois. Evidently, justice for the people of Illinois is something that Peoria Park District law enforcement agency evidently doesn't seem interested in.

I guess the moral of the story is, that if you want to commit a crime and get away with it, you need to be a government employee.

California: Have A Child, Go To Prison.

http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/05/13/1932032/calif-bill-could-jail-parents.html
Calif. bill could jail parents if kids miss school

The bill would let prosecutors charge parents with misdemeanors punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine if their kids miss too much school. Judges could delay the punishment to parents as an incentive to get their children to class.

The idiots in Sacramento, have decide to try to do something (horribly wrong) to try to get young students to attend school more regularly.

Let me see if it is possible to understand the twisted, warped logic (if you can call it that) that the politicians used to come up with this bill.

It looks to me like the same logic that the politicians use to allows big business to sell cigarettes, but makes it illegal for the purchasers to smoke cigarettes.

There are a few facts that we should keep in mind while considering this problem (evidently facts that politicians are incapable of considering).

California (and the United States) is in the middle of the "great depression". The State of California doesn't have enough money to keep violent felons in jail. As part of their balance the budget, California is setting free violent felons to terrorize the citizens into paying higher taxes. The unemployment rate is higher than 10%. If you count the underemployed and the unemployed so long they no longer look for work or no longer get unemployment benefits, the unemployment rate is higher than 20%.

So in an effort to get young students to stop missing school, single parents will be fined $2,000 that they don't have. How you may ask, will this help young students to stop missing school?

Placing a large fine on someone who already is having problems paying their monthly bills will help convince the parent to stop working and go on government assistance. If you have no job, then you have no money for the government to steal with their higher fines, fees, taxes, ... This is part of the government's plan to make everyone a criminal, and thus to assess fines, fees, taxes to help balance the budget.

So in an effort to get young students to stop missing school, single parents will be throw in prison. How you may ask, will this help young students to stop missing school?

While the parent has been rotting in prison for a year, the child or children have been placed in foster care. Children in the foster care system have a higher than average death rate then children outside the foster care system. So it is possible that if more children die, the statistics for absenteeism will be lower because of the fewer number of children still alive to attend school.

If the child or children are not killed by the foster care system, then at the very least they will have been traumatized so much that they are more likely to become criminals. And thus the overburdened state, will have even more crime to deal with then they are currently willing to deal with.

What do you think will happen when the parent, in a single parent home is thrown in prison for a year?

After rotting in prison for a year, the parent is likely to be unemployed, and because of the "great depression" unemployable. So they will now go on welfare or some other assistance program paid for by the dwindling number of employed people.

And there you have it. The forward thinking that has made the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea the great countries that they have become.

Drop Your Drawers, Get Out Of Jail.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_14527013
Since 1970s, ID-theft victim has been dogged by someone else's "criminal" past

In more than 30 years of trying, St. Charles, Mo., lawyer Gary Stewart Heggs has found only one fail-safe way to quickly prove he isn't an escaped inmate from Colorado:
Dropping his drawers.

Here is yet another typical case of American justice.

A criminal steals some one else's wallet and identification. The criminal gets arrested. The criminal gets booked. The criminal gets tried. The criminal gets convicted. All using the stolen identification. The criminal manages to break out of jail and avoid recapture. Law enforcement and the criminal justice system send out arrest warrants for the fugitive under the name on the stolen identification. This happened in 1971. The man who had his identity stolen is still constantly arrested because the state couldn't be bothered to find out the real identity of criminal. The law enforcement agencies and criminal justice system are still looking for the criminal under the stolen identity. The law enforcement agencies and criminal justice system refuse to quash the arrest warrant because they refuse to admit they made a mistake. And because in this country the innocent citizen has no rights and no ability to defend himself against the all seeing, the all knowing, and the all incompetent police state.

The law enforcement agency and the criminal justice system can't be bothered to correctly identify the people they throw in jail.

And if the police state is willing to spend this much time and effort harassing an innocent man, you know they will exert even less care when administering the new national health care system they have just rammed down the throats of the vigorously protesting public.

U.S.Supreme Court Upholds Criminal Activity By Lower Court Judges.

http://www.slate.com/id/2251663/
Courting Disaster

When the U.S. Supreme Court denied Charles Dean Hood's appeal last week, it was done in a one-sentence, unsigned order. Long after the conclusion of the trial, it became clear that his trial judge and prosecutor had been secretly involved in a years-long extramarital affair.

I wonder if it was the wise Latina who helped set this precedent for the judicial system. In any case, it is good to know that the members of the ruling class are able to commit any crime they choose without fear of punishment.

Appeals rejected Hood's challenge in two curt sentences last September, finding that his lawyers had waited too long to raise the issue on appeal. How Hood was to have raised the conflict of interest when the existence of the affair was not conclusively established until 2008, when the judge and prosecutor were forced to admit it under oath, is not explained.

Equally encouraging is knowing there is a statue of limitations on criminal activities perpetrated by law enforcement officials. It would greatly upet the judicial system if erroneously convicted innocent people were allowed to appeal their conviction when evidence of judicial wrongdoing is discovered at a later date.

California Justice. Free The Rapists And Killers. Imprison The Pot Smokers.

http://www.taxcannabis.org/index.php/pages/public-safety-benefits-fact-sheet

California’s Legal System Has its Priorities Wrong

According to the FBI, in 2008, almost 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved in California. That same year, over 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor cannabis possession.

What is wrong with these numbers?

According to the State of California, nothing.

If the police state arrest an individual for a violent crime, it costs the police State of California a lot of money for the capture, prosecution and imprisoning of that individual.

If the police state arrest an individual for a drug crime, they can confiscate all the criminals private property. Which means that the police State of California might even be able to break even or make a profit on the arrest of non-violent criminals.

The State of California is in the middle of a budget crisis. By following the advice of the Federal Reserve Board and other economists that Barack Hussein Obama trusts with the economy of the United States, the State of California is spending more than it collects in fees, taxes, permits, contributions, confiscations, ... Unlike the federal government, the State of California is unable to print more money. So the State of California needs some other way to balance the budget. So by ignoring violent crime in favor of non-violent drug crime, the State of California may be able to save a few million dollars. If you are a politician it is very easy to justify criminalizing a large portion of the population and endangering the rest of the population (by not investigating violent crime or letting prisoners go free early) in order to save a few million dollars (when you are billions short).

The California Senate Wants College Students To Die Of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/12/AR2010041203411.html
Calif. bill requires home carbon monoxide monitors

Monitors that detect the odorless, lethal gas already are required in new homes. The bill would extend the requirement to all houses, apartments and condominiums meeting the requirement but would exempt college dorms at state colleges and universities.

The California Senate decided that as part of any advanced education, students should be afforded the opportunity to die of carbon monoxide poisoning. After all, college and university students don't pay taxes. College and university students are a drain on society because of their wasteful spending habits and reckless borrowing. With the State of California having the highest unemployment rate in the country, even if the college and university students could graduate, they wouldn't be able to get job to repay their student loans, so they would only end up on welfare. So it is no loss if the college and university students don't live to graduate.

Property owned or leased by the state, including California State University and community college campuses, the University of California or a local government agency would be exempt. Those college dorms are not part of the mandate because of the projected cost to the state for installing the monitors.

Funny, but the State of California seems to think that their inability to pay is a reasonable excuse to exempt them from a law that they want to enforce on a majority of the slaves citizens who are in equal or worse financial shape.

Then again, could it be simply that the State of California is not required to obey any laws that it makes for the slaves citizens?

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa Announced That Los Angeles Is Now A Sanctuary City For Murderers.

http://www.kfiam640.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=153218&article=6983620
Budget Cuts Impact Murder Investigations

It was a tough decision. But Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was up to the task. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is well known for making the tough decisions. Like determining which news reporters to sleep with so his wife won't find out. Like determining which foreign cities to tour for his weekly vacations while pretending that this is work related. Like determining what pretext he can use to speed up the bankrupting ruining running the city.

The City of Los Angeles is running short of funds. Since it is obvious to everyone except the politicians, (that all the elected officials are in the pocket of the unions and special interest groups), that something must be done to force the taxpaying public to to give up everything they own to the city to prevent the bankruptcy of this great welfare city of ours. The politicians seem to have come up with a solution that is finding favor at the state levels where politicians are also trying to come up with the best way to punish the slaves citizens who are silly enough to believe that if they have a job and get paid they deserve to keep their earnings rather than pay them over to be mismanaged by the corrupt incompetent politicians.

The politicians at the state level have decided that giving violent criminals early release from prison is a great way to save money. The City of Los Angeles, a leader in innovation, has decided that you don't have to release violent criminals early if you never arrest them. In a budget saving cost cutting measure, the City of Los Angeles, is preventing police from investigating murders.

This will teach the slaves citizens never to disagree with their owners masters political leaders.

Use A Guitar, Go To Jail.

http://www.wisn.com/news/16510870/detail.html
8-Year-Old Blues Guitarist's Booking Agent Gets Death Threat

State Says 'T-Man' Can't Play In Clubs.

This is the story of an individual who has been practicing guitar for 2 or 3 hours per day for the last 3 years. He is currently a member of 2 bands. He enjoys playing the blues.

Courtesy of the State of Wisconsin, he is now experiencing the blues first hand. It seems that it is against the law for an 8 year old musician to play the blues in any club that would want to hire him. Most blues musicians play in clubs that serve alcohol. It is a crime for an individual under the age of 18 to play guitar in a club that serves alcohol.

Do you think that this 8 year old blues guitarist is happy the state is protecting him from playing in a band in front of an appreciative audience?

Police Have Authority To Strand Innocent Injured Motorists At The Side Of The Road.

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/30/3098.asp
Arizona: Federal Court Denies Summary Relief To Innocent Motorist Stranded By Cop

A motorist was left with little recourse after police grabbed his truck and stranded him, alone, on the side of the road in a dangerous Mesa, Arizona neighborhood -- even though he had not done anything wrong. US District Court Judge David G Campbell issued a preliminary ruling last Friday that Ted Mink, 47, had no right to sue the city over his treatment at the hands of the police.

I am glad the federal court finally cleared that up.

The police state has no duty to inform the slaves citizens of any action the police state takes against them. The slaves citizens don't have the right to protect themselves. The police have no duty to protect the slaves citizens. The police have no duty to act in a civilized matter towards any slave citizen they meet.

"At worst, the officers intentionally left a man with a serious heel injury on the side of a road in the middle of the day, but near several gas stations where he could presumably call for help, pointed a weapon at him when it appeared he might assault the driver of a tow truck that had been called and refused to give him a ride home," Campbell wrote. "This conduct, even if actionable on other grounds, is not so extreme as to go beyond all bounds of decency and be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable." (U.S. District Court Judge David G Campbell)

I would like to see a judge or politician stranded at the side of the road when the police impound their vehicle in a crime ridden neighborhood and have the judge or politician still claim that is an appropriate action on the part of the police state.

Oops. I forgot. All politicians and federal workers are above the law, and this could never happen to them.

Jerry Brown Soft On Crime.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-acorn2-2010apr02,0,497720.story
California probe clears ACORN of criminal activity

Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown cites the advocacy group's objectionable behavior but says it does not warrant legal action by authorities.

California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown said in a report Thursday that the community organizing group ACORN engaged in "highly inappropriate behavior" in the state but violated no criminal law.

California Attorney General (and governor hopeful) Jerry Brown just finished an investigation where he whitewashed the criminal activity of A.C.O.R.N.

The report said ACORN probably violated state civil laws by disposing of thousands of pages containing confidential information about employees, members and other individuals in a trash bin, failing to file a 2007 state tax return and engaging in four instances of possible voter registration fraud in San Diego.

ACORN also was unable to document how it used charitable funds raised for the victims of Southern California wildfires, the report said. But the probe "determined that ACORN spent more than it likely raised for the fire victims, and therefore further action into this issue is not a wise use of the state's resources," the report said.

Evidently, when a private party tries to gather evidence of organized criminal activity, this is a more serious crime deserving more serious punishment than defrauding the federal and state government and disobeying multiple laws. Specially when the organization you are going after is funded by the federal government. Since the federal government is above the law, any organization funded by the federal government automatically gets the same benefits. Therefore anybody trying to catch government employees (or government funded organizations) breaking the law are committing a serious crime and the whistle blowers will face the full might of the federal government.

Sell A Goldfish, Go To Prison.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262250/Great-grandmother-tagged-selling-goldfish.html
Pet shop owner fined £1,000 and told to wear an electronic tag... for selling a GOLDFISH to a boy aged 14

It is good to see that the criminal justice systems all over the world have their priorities straight. Selling a goldfish to a child less than 16 years old is a serious crime in England.

The maximum penalty is imprisonment for up to 12 months, or a fine of up to £20,000, or both.

It is more serious than beating a dog to death, molesting a girl, punching out a policeman, selling heroin, trying to kill girlfriend, ...

It is good to know that the justice system around the world is protecting the rights of goldfish.

California Looks To Release All Violent Felons To Save The Cost Of Keeping Them Incarcerated.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iGbkP7pNr4yedct5oNesQlhiYxxwD9EPQ2980
AP Enterprise: Calif. freeing some violent inmates

Inmates convicted of violent crimes are among those being freed early from California jails to save money, despite lawmakers' promises that they would exclude most dangerous prisoners and sex offenders.

As part of the "catch and release" program that the State of California claims is necessary to balance the budget, the state has decided that it will be more cost effective to release violent felons rather than non-violent offenders. Like all government planning, this will serve the state in many ways. If any victims are killed or injured, then those victims won't vote against any future tax rate hikes or vote against any new taxes. Also, releasing violent felons may scare all the potential victims into voting for the next set of tax rate hikes and the next new taxes. Any deaths or injuries will serve as a reminder that if new tax rate hikes and new taxes are not approved, there are many more much more violent felons waiting for early release.

A regular win-win situation for the State of California. Who knows, after the next round of tax rate hikes and new taxes, the State of California can afford to give pay hikes to the tireless state workers who came up with this genius plan.

Global Warming And Environmental Activists Advocate A Per Person Fee To Create Carbon Dioxide.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-03-29-tanning29_ST_N.htm
Tanning beds face new taxes and restrictions

Growing concerns about the dangers of indoor tanning beds are leading to new taxes — and possibly new restrictions — designed to curb the practice among young people.

I think the government has finally figured out their role in oppressing their slaves citizens.

Because the government wastes so much money in giveaways to provide for the health and welfare of illegal aliens, criminals and repaying bribes from big businesses they are running out of money for services for the legitimate honest tax paying slaves citizens. While the government could cut down on services to the criminals and repayment of bribes with contracts for products and services that the slaves citizens don't need or want, it will never happen. The government knows that anyone you bribe with free goods and services will vote for you or contribute to your next reelection campaign.

So what does that leave?

The State of California has started a catch and release program. The police arrest criminals, the State of California prosecutes criminals. Then the State of California releases the criminals because of overcrowding and lack of funds. While it saves some money to catch and release criminals, most of the cost is not in warehousing the criminals. It costs millions of dollars to prosecute any criminal that has any money and can afford any kind of "dream team" defense. This solution is still too expensive.

So the next best thing is to criminalize otherwise normal activities. But don't make it a felony crime. Make it a misdemeanor crime. That way the government can charge some kind of fee which is small enough that it is not cost effective to defend against the crime. In this way, the government doesn't need to worry about "dream team" defenses and the warehousing of criminals (who live better than typical working class slaves citizens). In addition to escalating fines for parking, and cell phone usage, the government is going to start taxing fines for using tanning booths. But even this is likely to be too taxing for the government to handle with any efficiency.

The government will need to find something even more obvious and easier for the beat cop to enforce.

The "Global Warming" and environmental activists have come up with perfect the solution for the government. They have managed to brainwash the government into believing that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Since all living, breathing humans exhale carbon dioxide, all humans are therefore by government definition polluters. And how does the government treat polluters? Why the government licenses and regulates them and sets the amount of pollutants they can create. Which means that in the near future, when you get your government identity card, you will have to pay for your annual license for the ability to create pollution. If you ever can't afford to pay, then you may eventually get sold off to someone who can afford to pay for your right to pollute. If you can't afford to pay for your children, then your children will get confiscated and sold off to companies that can afford to pay the "Greenhouse Gas" fee / fine / tax.

Budget crisis solved!

While you may have the right to receive inadequate insurance and inadequate medical care, the "Global Warming" and environmental activists have convinced the government that you don't have the right to breathe.

Democratic Politicians Upset That Their Immoral And Illegal Acts Provoked Immoral And Illegal Responses.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001138-503544.html
Hoyer: Violent Threats Not "Par for the Course"

(Democratic) House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer Thursday strongly condemned threats leveled against House Democrats in the wake of a historic vote on health care reform and said both parties need to do a better job of keeping the debate civil.

Is there a civil way for Democratic politicians to denounce the majority of the American public as mindless drones obeying right wing talk show hosts? Is there a civil way for Democratic politicians to subvert the Bill of Rights and Constitution of the United States? Is there a civil way for Democratic politicians to accept bribes to vote for a Health Care Deform Bill they all hate? Is there a civil way for Democratic politicians to vote for a Health Care Deform Bill which does nothing to reform health care?

I don't think so.

Therefore it should come as no surprise to the Democratic politicians who showed their supreme contempt for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the people of the United States when the slaves citizens respond in the only way that the Democratic politicians understand (threats of violence).

Maybe the Democratic politicians need to think of the threats of violence against them as poetic justice. Since the American public can't subvert the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the American public had to select other laws to break to respond to the high crimes and misdemeanors that the Democratic politicians perpetrated (with immunity) on the American public.

Federal Government Crime Wave Continues.

http://www.just-a-regular-guy.com/2009/06/13/osha-investigates-ruger-firearm-plant-wants-250k-in-fines-imposed/
OSHA Investigates Ruger Firearm Plant–Wants 250K In Fines Imposed

The criminal enterprise known as the federal government has figured out yet another way to subvert the Constitution of the United States to produce yet another attack on the Bill of Rights.

The second amendment of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States proclaims that the citizens need to be able to own weapons to protect themselves from the federal government. The federal government has investigated the second amendment, and determined that the federal government the founders of this country were afraid is not the current administration, because the current administration didn't exist at that time, so it must be some other federal government the founders of the United States were afraid of. Since the federal government has been unsuccessful in brainwashing all the slaves citizens into this belief, the federal government needs to take other subversive steps to protect themselves from the slaves citizens.

In an effort to keep the slaves citizens oppressed and downtrodden, the federal government continually creates new laws and new organizations to help them the rabble in their place.

If the federal government is unable to subvert the Constitution and the Bill of Rights directly, they will have to do it indirectly. Since the federal government is uncomfortable passing a law stating that the slaves citizens are not allowed to protect themselves, the federal government needs a way to do it indirectly. If no manufacturer is allowed to make guns, it makes it harder for the law abiding slaves citizens to buy guns. So the federal government will outlaw the means of production of guns for self protection. That is where the Occupational Safety & Health Administration comes into place. After a 6 month investigation, the O.S.H.A. managed to create 60 "violations of safety and health standards" and issue $255,150 in fines. In an effort to pretend they are a fair and unbiased organization, the O.S.H.A., which took 6 months to investigate the alleged problems, is allowing Sturm-Ruger Co. Inc. (a gun manufacturer) 15 days to respond to the the complaint.

But the government doesn't need to worry. There has never been and never will be any government organization that will rule against the themselves or the government that provides their funding and provides for their continued existence.

What The United States Could Learn From North Korea.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/22/north-korea-american-trial-illegal-entry
North Korea to put US citizen on trial for illegal entry

North Korea today said it would put a US citizen on trial for entering the country illegally.

You will never see a similar headline in the United States about putting an illegal alien on trial for crossing the border.

In North Korea, they are afraid that any person entering their country illegally has the potential to kill the dictator-in-chief and / or overthrow the existing government.

In the United States, anyone entering the country illegally is considered a future democratic voter. So instead of punishment, the government is falling all over itself to provide free services that are not available in the country the criminals came from. So there is no federal effort to prevent anyone from illegally crossing the United States borders. And if anyone who does cross the borders illegally, they are not punished. At worst, they are sent home, to try to cross the borders again.

I guess the federal government wants to make it easier for the Muslim terrorists to smuggle themselves and their weapons across the border so their next attack on Americans can take place on American soil.