Who needs free speech?

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google-obama25-2009nov25,0,98932.story
Google won't exclude distorted Michelle Obama image from its site

This is America. Where free speech is just words on a piece of paper that nobody reads any more, and that nobody can understand. After all, how can you trust anything written by slave owners a couple hundred years ago.

The media is already telling us we don't need the 10th amendment to the constitution. Maybe they should come out and say we don't need the 1st amendment. After all, the media won't say anything that will displease our current Too Black To Fail leader. And as long as they are free to say anything the the leader wants to hear, they don't need free speech.

Does anybody know why the media which is currently so upset about an image of the first lady, did NOT get upset about negative images of the previous President of the United States?